From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:41288 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751649AbdBSWOM (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Feb 2017 17:14:12 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098393.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.20/8.16.0.20) with SMTP id v1JMDpDU110583 for ; Sun, 19 Feb 2017 17:14:09 -0500 Received: from e38.co.us.ibm.com (e38.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.159]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 28pp6ktf62-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sun, 19 Feb 2017 17:14:09 -0500 Received: from localhost by e38.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Sun, 19 Feb 2017 15:14:08 -0700 Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2017 14:14:04 -0800 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: Re: [PATCH] appendix/whymb: Fix a typo, smb_wmb into smp_wmb Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20170217015415.32519-1-sj38.park@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170217015415.32519-1-sj38.park@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20170219221404.GL30506@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: perfbook-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: SeongJae Park Cc: perfbook@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 10:54:15AM +0900, SeongJae Park wrote: > Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park Good eyes, applied, thank you! Thanx, Paul > --- > appendix/whymb/whymemorybarriers.tex | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/appendix/whymb/whymemorybarriers.tex b/appendix/whymb/whymemorybarriers.tex > index 9002047a9878..3a22e46beb0c 100644 > --- a/appendix/whymb/whymemorybarriers.tex > +++ b/appendix/whymb/whymemorybarriers.tex > @@ -2265,7 +2265,7 @@ a write to a given MMIO register affects the value that will next be > read from {\em some other} MMIO register. > > It is not clear why SPARC does not define \co{wmb()} to be > -\co{membar #MemIssue} and \co{smb_wmb()} to be > +\co{membar #MemIssue} and \co{smp_wmb()} to be > \co{membar #StoreStore}, > as the current definitions seem vulnerable to bugs in some drivers. > It is quite possible that all the SPARC CPUs that Linux runs on > -- > 2.10.0 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe perfbook" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >