From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:40494 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751738AbeBYXAx (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Feb 2018 18:00:53 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w1PMweQW030276 for ; Sun, 25 Feb 2018 18:00:53 -0500 Received: from e18.ny.us.ibm.com (e18.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.208]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2gbp1cnq7a-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sun, 25 Feb 2018 18:00:52 -0500 Received: from localhost by e18.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Sun, 25 Feb 2018 18:00:52 -0500 Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2018 15:01:18 -0800 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: Re: [PATCH] future/QC: Remove 'Readout' in header of 'entanglement error rate' row Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <1e4f8413-f968-9d37-6322-8057bfe97bb7@gmail.com> <20180225182303.GE2855@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <20180225230118.GH2855@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: perfbook-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Akira Yokosawa Cc: perfbook@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 07:30:08AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote: > >From 4d1964b2296525414181b8e9b8fc7a77297fa838 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Akira Yokosawa > Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 07:10:27 +0900 > Subject: [PATCH] future/QC: Remove 'Readout' in header of 'entanglement error rate' row > > Signed-off-by: Akira Yokosawa > --- > Paul, > > Looking at the retouched table once again, I find > "readout of entanglement gate" doesn't make sense. The "Readout" > in the header should be removed, shouldn't it? It is quite confusing, now that you mention it! I took a slightly different approach with your Reported-by, so please take a look and tell me what you think. I considered adding a few qubit operators to the "Qubit Operator" heading like I did for "Qubit Entanglement", but wasn't sure whether this would help. Thoughts? Thanx, Paul > Thanks, Akra > -- > future/QC.tex | 14 +++++++------- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/future/QC.tex b/future/QC.tex > index 1afae2c..a5b1758 100644 > --- a/future/QC.tex > +++ b/future/QC.tex > @@ -677,26 +677,26 @@ $10^{-4}$). > } > > \subfloat[Multi-Qubit Gate Properties (Entanglement)]{ > -\begin{tabular}{@{}ll*{6}{S[table-format=2.2]}@{}} > +\begin{tabular}{@{}l*{6}{S[table-format=2.2]}@{}} > \toprule > - & & \multicolumn{6}{c}{Entanglement Connection} \\ > - \cmidrule{3-8} > - \multicolumn{2}{c}{Gate Property} & > + & \multicolumn{6}{c}{Entanglement Connection} \\ > + \cmidrule{2-7} > + Gate Property & > \multicolumn{1}{c}{CX0\_1} & > \multicolumn{1}{c}{CX1\_2} & > \multicolumn{1}{c}{CX0\_2} & > \multicolumn{1}{c}{CX3\_2} & > \multicolumn{1}{c}{CX4\_2} & > \multicolumn{1}{c@{}}{CX3\_4} \\ > - \cmidrule(r){1-2} \cmidrule{3-8} > - Readout & Error Rate (\%) & > + \cmidrule(r){1-1} \cmidrule{2-7} > + Error Rate (\%) & > 3.46 & > 4.07 & > 3.26 & > 2.76 & > 2.23 & > 2.66 \\ > - & Fidelity (\%) & > + Fidelity (\%) & > 96.54 & > 95.93 & > 96.74 & > -- > 2.7.4 > >