From: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: perfbook@vger.kernel.org, Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] locking: Fix reference to code snippet by "figure"
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 00:21:50 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2de7dca8-dbf1-471a-594e-032afa113ce5@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54d29326-1695-4b98-48a7-ff9c1439f448@gmail.com>
From 0d7e7b86bf743ee1646b705f246bc50e38d23803 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 23:35:34 +0900
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] locking: Fix reference to code snippet by "figure"
They are the remnant of old style labeling of code snippets as
figures.
Signed-off-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>
---
locking/locking-existence.tex | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/locking/locking-existence.tex b/locking/locking-existence.tex
index 3b62da0..ede3284 100644
--- a/locking/locking-existence.tex
+++ b/locking/locking-existence.tex
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ Listing~\ref{lst:locking:Per-Element Locking Without Existence Guarantees}.
Consider the following sequence of events:
\begin{enumerate}
\item Thread~0 invokes \co{delete(0)}, and reaches line~\lnref{acq} of
- the figure, acquiring the lock.
+ the listing, acquiring the lock.
\item Thread~1 concurrently invokes \co{delete(0)}, reaching
line~\lnref{acq}, but spins on the lock because Thread~0 holds it.
\item Thread~0 executes lines~\lnref{NULL}-\lnref{return1}, removing the element from
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ This approach allows acquiring the proper lock (on line~\lnref{acq}) before
gaining a pointer to the data element (on line~\lnref{getp}).
Although this approach works quite well for elements contained in a
single partitionable data structure such as the hash table shown in the
-figure, it can be problematic if a given data element can be a member
+listing, it can be problematic if a given data element can be a member
of multiple hash tables or given more-complex data structures such
as trees or graphs.
Not only can these problems be solved, but the solutions also form
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-19 15:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-19 15:15 [PATCH 0/3] locking: Update code snippets Akira Yokosawa
2018-11-19 15:17 ` [PATCH 1/3] locking: Employ new snippet scheme Akira Yokosawa
2018-11-19 15:19 ` [PATCH 2/3] locking: Get rid of ACCESS_ONCE() Akira Yokosawa
2018-11-19 15:21 ` Akira Yokosawa [this message]
2018-11-19 17:12 ` [PATCH 0/3] locking: Update code snippets Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2de7dca8-dbf1-471a-594e-032afa113ce5@gmail.com \
--to=akiyks@gmail.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=perfbook@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox