From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jithu Joseph Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] platform/x86: Add Slim Bootloader firmware update support Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 12:57:05 -0700 Message-ID: <01620c87bb6aa7870854ae1e23ec7bd379a058de.camel@intel.com> References: <20200423224222.29730-1-jithu.joseph@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Darren Hart , Andy Shevchenko , Platform Driver , Linux Kernel Mailing List , maurice.ma@intel.com, ravi.p.rangarajan@intel.com, Sean V Kelley , kuo-lang.tseng@intel.com, jithu.joseph@intel.com List-Id: platform-driver-x86.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2020-04-27 at 13:03 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > We use a bit different template for module names > > vendor-...-wmi > > (yes, with exception to TBT) > > I would like to rename sbl_fwu_wmi to something like this: > > intel-wmi-sbl-fw-update > > What do you think? Yes I think it is better to rename this driver to intel-wmi-sbl-fw- update as you suggested, given many drivers follow vendor-wmi-* pattern. Thanks for pointing this out. I will send v3 which addresses this. Thanks Jithu