From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89DD1C433DB for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 12:04:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E00E21E92 for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 12:04:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726586AbhADMDe (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jan 2021 07:03:34 -0500 Received: from mga17.intel.com ([192.55.52.151]:42377 "EHLO mga17.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726248AbhADMDe (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jan 2021 07:03:34 -0500 IronPort-SDR: 1+ILK4/j/0Xbs6yoCrmypXm4DzifUyaeOo3XuYZaxNu84/GZ4v7F6ASLeJG8B4qcjy/xz2ae1S llH0/AYfG5yg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9853"; a="156730916" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.78,473,1599548400"; d="scan'208";a="156730916" Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Jan 2021 04:01:48 -0800 IronPort-SDR: hIoipRhzzkF8mo4JLzD2ICHVzgvHn9R3mRzd8wASbccG+S2u1JtidDRD2ksMWkHbEF3kUl0pj3 c7pvz5/NEJSg== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.78,473,1599548400"; d="scan'208";a="360757765" Received: from hnanjund-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.254.115.148]) by orsmga002-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Jan 2021 04:01:45 -0800 Message-ID: <0e810c97a01868f3d8fb7b58af7c1122ef85270b.camel@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: tools/power/x86/intel-speed-select: Fixes for regression From: Srinivas Pandruvada To: Hans de Goede , mgross@linux.intel.com Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2021 04:01:41 -0800 In-Reply-To: References: <20201221071859.2783957-1-srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> <489cb4bb-28b5-e7c8-829e-3d58f047f514@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.2 (3.38.2-1.fc33) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org Hi Hans, On Mon, 2021-01-04 at 12:57 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 1/4/21 12:56 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 12/21/20 8:18 AM, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: > > > One side-effect of fixing the scaling frequency limits using the > > > commit eacc9c5a927e ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Fix > > > intel_pstate_get_hwp_max() > > > for turbo disabled") causes stale HWP_CAP.GUARANTEED to be used > > > as max. > > > Without processing HWP interrupts, user space needs to be able to > > > update > > > a new max while Intel SST is in use. This is not a problem as the > > > change of guaranteed is caused by user space action, so user > > > space knows > > > that guarantee will change. > > > > > > This series causes user space to trigger scaling_max_freq update > > > with > > > the new base_frequency. > > > > > > > > > Srinivas Pandruvada (2): > > >   tools/power/x86/intel-speed-select: Set scaling_max_freq to > > >     base_frequency > > >   tools/power/x86/intel-speed-select: Set higher of > > > cpuinfo_max_freq or > > >     base_frequency > > > > Thank you for your patch-series, I've applied the series to my > > review-hans branch: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-drivers-x86.git/log/?h=review-hans > > > > Note it will show up in my review-hans branch once I've pushed my > > local branch there, which might take a while. > > > > Once I've run some tests on this branch the patches there will be > > added to the platform-drivers-x86/for-next branch and eventually > > will be included in the pdx86 pull-request to Linus for the next > > merge-window. > > Note this is a templated reply, I will also cherry-pick these into > the > fixes branch in this case. > Then you can ignore my previous email. Thanks, Srinivas > Regards, > > Hans >