public inbox for platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To: "David E. Box" <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
Cc: thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com,
	 irenic.rajneesh@gmail.com, srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com,
	 intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	 xi.pardee@linux.intel.com, Hans de Goede <hansg@kernel.org>,
	 LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/22] platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram: Refactor DEVID/PWRMBASE extraction into helper
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 18:33:14 +0200 (EET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0ef8cc6a-89be-d4aa-1479-ec20d6b11e1e@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260313015202.3660072-18-david.e.box@linux.intel.com>

On Thu, 12 Mar 2026, David E. Box wrote:

> Move DEVID/PWRMBASE extraction into pmc_ssram_get_devid_pwrmbase().
> 
> This is a preparatory refactor to place functionality in a common helper
> for reuse by a subsequent patch, while keeping behavior unchanged in this
> step.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  .../platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram_telemetry.c  | 31 ++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram_telemetry.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram_telemetry.c
> index 9c3d7ba2fd52..75a80a74a069 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram_telemetry.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram_telemetry.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,23 @@ DEFINE_FREE(pmc_ssram_telemetry_iounmap, void __iomem *, if (_T) iounmap(_T))
>  static struct pmc_ssram_telemetry pmc_ssram_telems[3];
>  static bool device_probed;
>  
> +static inline u64 get_base(void __iomem *addr, u32 offset)
> +{
> +	return lo_hi_readq(addr + offset) & GENMASK_ULL(63, 3);

A pre-existing problem: Header for GENMASK_ULL() is missing from this 
file.

I also would prefer having that field named with define but that too is a 
pre-existing thing.

-- 
 i.


> +}
> +
> +static void pmc_ssram_get_devid_pwrmbase(void __iomem *ssram, unsigned int pmc_idx)
> +{
> +	u64 pwrm_base;
> +	u16 devid;
> +
> +	pwrm_base = get_base(ssram, SSRAM_PWRM_OFFSET);
> +	devid = readw(ssram + SSRAM_DEVID_OFFSET);
> +
> +	pmc_ssram_telems[pmc_idx].devid = devid;
> +	pmc_ssram_telems[pmc_idx].base_addr = pwrm_base;
> +}
> +
>  static int
>  pmc_ssram_telemetry_add_pmt(struct pci_dev *pcidev, u64 ssram_base, void __iomem *ssram)
>  {
> @@ -63,18 +80,12 @@ pmc_ssram_telemetry_add_pmt(struct pci_dev *pcidev, u64 ssram_base, void __iomem
>  	return intel_vsec_register(&pcidev->dev, &info);
>  }
>  
> -static inline u64 get_base(void __iomem *addr, u32 offset)
> -{
> -	return lo_hi_readq(addr + offset) & GENMASK_ULL(63, 3);
> -}
> -
>  static int
>  pmc_ssram_telemetry_get_pmc(struct pci_dev *pcidev, unsigned int pmc_idx, u32 offset)
>  {
>  	void __iomem __free(pmc_ssram_telemetry_iounmap) *tmp_ssram = NULL;
>  	void __iomem __free(pmc_ssram_telemetry_iounmap) *ssram = NULL;
> -	u64 ssram_base, pwrm_base;
> -	u16 devid;
> +	u64 ssram_base;
>  
>  	ssram_base = pci_resource_start(pcidev, 0);
>  	tmp_ssram = ioremap(ssram_base, SSRAM_HDR_SIZE);
> @@ -99,11 +110,7 @@ pmc_ssram_telemetry_get_pmc(struct pci_dev *pcidev, unsigned int pmc_idx, u32 of
>  		ssram = no_free_ptr(tmp_ssram);
>  	}
>  
> -	pwrm_base = get_base(ssram, SSRAM_PWRM_OFFSET);
> -	devid = readw(ssram + SSRAM_DEVID_OFFSET);
> -
> -	pmc_ssram_telems[pmc_idx].devid = devid;
> -	pmc_ssram_telems[pmc_idx].base_addr = pwrm_base;
> +	pmc_ssram_get_devid_pwrmbase(ssram, pmc_idx);
>  
>  	/* Find and register and PMC telemetry entries */
>  	return pmc_ssram_telemetry_add_pmt(pcidev, ssram_base, ssram);
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-17 16:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-13  1:51 [PATCH 00/22] platform/x86/intel: Add ACPI PMT discovery support and enable NVL PMC telemetry David E. Box
2026-03-13  1:51 ` [PATCH 01/22] platform/x86/intel/vsec: Refactor base_addr handling David E. Box
2026-03-13  1:51 ` [PATCH 02/22] platform/x86/intel/vsec: Make driver_data info const David E. Box
2026-03-13  1:51 ` [PATCH 03/22] platform/x86/intel/vsec: Decouple add/link helpers from PCI David E. Box
2026-03-13  1:51 ` [PATCH 04/22] platform/x86/intel/vsec: Switch exported helpers from pci_dev to device David E. Box
2026-03-13  1:51 ` [PATCH 05/22] platform/x86/intel/vsec: Return real error codes from registration path David E. Box
2026-03-13  1:51 ` [PATCH 06/22] platform/x86/intel/vsec: Plumb ACPI PMT discovery tables through vsec David E. Box
2026-03-17 16:54   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-03-13  1:51 ` [PATCH 07/22] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Add pre/post decode hooks around header parsing David E. Box
2026-03-13  1:51 ` [PATCH 08/22] platform/x86/intel/pmt/crashlog: Split init into pre-decode David E. Box
2026-03-13  1:51 ` [PATCH 09/22] platform/x86/intel/pmt/telemetry: Move overlap check to post-decode hook David E. Box
2026-03-13  1:51 ` [PATCH 10/22] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Move header decode into common helper David E. Box
2026-03-17 15:42   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-03-13  1:51 ` [PATCH 11/22] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Pass discovery index instead of resource David E. Box
2026-03-13  1:51 ` [PATCH 12/22] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Unify header fetch and add ACPI source David E. Box
2026-03-17 15:57   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-03-13  1:51 ` [PATCH 13/22] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Add PMC SSRAM Kconfig description David E. Box
2026-03-13  1:51 ` [PATCH 14/22] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Add ACPI PWRM telemetry driver for Nova Lake S David E. Box
2026-03-17 16:24   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-03-13  1:51 ` [PATCH 15/22] platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram: Rename probe and PCI ID table for consistency David E. Box
2026-03-17 16:26   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-03-13  1:51 ` [PATCH 16/22] platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram: Use fixed-size static pmc array David E. Box
2026-03-13  1:51 ` [PATCH 17/22] platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram: Refactor DEVID/PWRMBASE extraction into helper David E. Box
2026-03-17 16:33   ` Ilpo Järvinen [this message]
2026-03-13  1:51 ` [PATCH 18/22] platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram: Add PCI platform data David E. Box
2026-03-17 16:35   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-03-13  1:51 ` [PATCH 19/22] platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram: Refactor memory barrier for reentrant probe David E. Box
2026-03-17 16:40   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-03-13  1:51 ` [PATCH 20/22] platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram: Add ACPI discovery scaffolding David E. Box
2026-03-17 16:45   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-03-13  1:52 ` [PATCH 21/22] platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram: Make PMT registration optional David E. Box
2026-03-17 16:48   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-03-13  1:52 ` [PATCH 22/22] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Add NVL PCI IDs for SSRAM telemetry discovery David E. Box
2026-03-13 15:03 ` [PATCH 00/22] platform/x86/intel: Add ACPI PMT discovery support and enable NVL PMC telemetry srinivas pandruvada

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0ef8cc6a-89be-d4aa-1479-ec20d6b11e1e@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david.e.box@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=hansg@kernel.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=irenic.rajneesh@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=xi.pardee@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox