From: "Hegde, Suma" <Suma.Hegde@amd.com>
To: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <nchatrad@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] platform/x86: Convert to ACPI based probing
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 15:57:03 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <11fcc515-679c-c1ea-2bf3-862c875e1044@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5cda9436-f2e7-7b7a-46d4-82e5b0e07cb@linux.intel.com>
Hi Ilpo,
On 12/20/2023 11:04 PM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.
>
>
> On Wed, 20 Dec 2023, Suma Hegde wrote:
>
>> ACPI table provides mailbox base address and register offset
>> information. The base address is provided as part of CRS method
>> and mailbox offsets are provided through DSD table.
>> Sockets are differentiated by UIDs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Suma Hegde <suma.hegde@amd.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <nchatrad@amd.com>
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>> 1. Define amd_hsmp_acpi_rdwr() for doing mailbox memory mapped io
>> 2. Add a check to see if mailbox register offsets are set in
>> hsmp_read_acpi_dsd()
>> 3. Add a check to see if sock->mbinfo.base_addr sockck->mbinfo.size are
>> set in hsmp_read_acpi_crs()
>> 4. Change order of the statements in switch case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_FIXED_MEMORY32
>> in hsmp_resource()
>> 5. Add hsmp_test() after hsmp_parse_acpi_table() call
>> 6. Add r.end < r.start check in hsmp_resource()
>> 7. Add !dsd error check in hsmp_read_acpi_dsd
>>
>> ---
>> drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c | 323 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 296 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c
>> index 3508399c6aa9..726ba73e23dd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp.c
>> @@ -18,9 +18,11 @@
>> #include <linux/pci.h>
>> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> #include <linux/semaphore.h>
>> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
>>
>> #define DRIVER_NAME "amd_hsmp"
>> -#define DRIVER_VERSION "2.0"
>> +#define DRIVER_VERSION "2.2"
>> +#define ACPI_HSMP_DEVICE_HID "AMDI0097"
>>
>> /* HSMP Status / Error codes */
>> #define HSMP_STATUS_NOT_READY 0x00
>> @@ -54,6 +56,11 @@
>>
>> #define HSMP_ATTR_GRP_NAME_SIZE 10
>>
>> +/* These are the strings specified in ACPI table */
>> +#define MSG_IDOFF_STR "MsgIdOffset"
>> +#define MSG_ARGOFF_STR "MsgArgOffset"
>> +#define MSG_RESPOFF_STR "MsgRspOffset"
>> +
>> struct hsmp_mbaddr_info {
>> u32 base_addr;
>> u32 msg_id_off;
>> @@ -66,6 +73,7 @@ struct hsmp_socket {
>> struct bin_attribute hsmp_attr;
>> struct hsmp_mbaddr_info mbinfo;
>> void __iomem *metric_tbl_addr;
>> + void __iomem *virt_base_addr;
>> struct semaphore hsmp_sem;
>> char name[HSMP_ATTR_GRP_NAME_SIZE];
>> struct pci_dev *root;
>> @@ -78,12 +86,14 @@ struct hsmp_plat_device {
>> struct hsmp_socket *sock;
>> u32 proto_ver;
>> u16 num_sockets;
>> + bool is_acpi_device;
>> + bool is_probed;
>> };
>>
>> static struct hsmp_plat_device plat_dev;
>>
>> -static int amd_hsmp_rdwr(struct hsmp_socket *sock, u32 offset,
>> - u32 *value, bool write)
>> +static int amd_hsmp_pci_rdwr(struct hsmp_socket *sock, u32 offset,
>> + u32 *value, bool write)
>> {
>> int ret;
>>
>> @@ -101,8 +111,29 @@ static int amd_hsmp_rdwr(struct hsmp_socket *sock, u32 offset,
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> +static void amd_hsmp_acpi_rdwr(struct hsmp_socket *sock, u32 offset,
>> + u32 *value, bool write)
>> +{
>> + if (write)
>> + iowrite32(*value, sock->virt_base_addr + offset);
>> + else
>> + *value = ioread32(sock->virt_base_addr + offset);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int amd_hsmp_rdwr(struct hsmp_socket *sock, u32 offset,
>> + u32 *value, bool write)
>> +{
>> + if (plat_dev.is_acpi_device)
>> + amd_hsmp_acpi_rdwr(sock, offset, value, write);
>> + else
>> + return amd_hsmp_pci_rdwr(sock, offset, value, write);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> /*
>> - * Send a message to the HSMP port via PCI-e config space registers.
>> + * Send a message to the HSMP port via PCI-e config space registers
>> + * or by writing to MMIO space.
>> *
>> * The caller is expected to zero out any unused arguments.
>> * If a response is expected, the number of response words should be greater than 0.
>> @@ -450,6 +481,9 @@ static int hsmp_create_sysfs_interface(void)
>> int ret;
>> u16 i;
>>
>> + if (plat_dev.is_acpi_device)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> /* String formatting is currently limited to u8 sockets */
>> if (WARN_ON(plat_dev.num_sockets > U8_MAX))
>> return -ERANGE;
>> @@ -487,13 +521,188 @@ static int hsmp_create_sysfs_interface(void)
>> return devm_device_add_groups(plat_dev.sock[0].dev, hsmp_attr_grps);
>> }
>>
>> -static int hsmp_cache_proto_ver(void)
>> +/* This is the UUID used for HSMP */
>> +static const guid_t acpi_hsmp_uuid = GUID_INIT(0xb74d619d, 0x5707, 0x48bd,
>> + 0xa6, 0x9f, 0x4e, 0xa2,
>> + 0x87, 0x1f, 0xc2, 0xf6);
>> +
>> +static inline bool is_acpi_hsmp_uuid(union acpi_object *obj)
>> +{
>> + if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER && obj->buffer.length == 16)
>> + return guid_equal((guid_t *)obj->buffer.pointer, &acpi_hsmp_uuid);
>> +
>> + return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline int hsmp_get_uid(struct device *dev, u16 *sock_ind)
>> +{
>> + char *uid;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * UID (ID00, ID01..IDXX) is used for differentiating sockets,
>> + * read it and strip the "ID" part of it and convert the remaining
>> + * bytes to integer.
>> + */
>> + uid = acpi_device_uid(ACPI_COMPANION(dev));
>> +
>> + return kstrtou16((uid + 2), 10, sock_ind);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static acpi_status hsmp_resource(struct acpi_resource *res, void *data)
>> +{
>> + struct hsmp_socket *sock = data;
>> + struct resource r;
>> +
>> + switch (res->type) {
>> + case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_FIXED_MEMORY32:
>> + if (!acpi_dev_resource_memory(res, &r))
>> + return AE_ERROR;
>> + if (!r.start || r.end < r.start || !(r.flags & IORESOURCE_MEM_WRITEABLE))
>> + return AE_ERROR;
>> + sock->mbinfo.base_addr = r.start;
>> + sock->mbinfo.size = r.end - r.start + 1;
> resource_size(r)
>
>> + break;
>> + case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_END_TAG:
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + return AE_ERROR;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return AE_OK;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int hsmp_read_acpi_dsd(struct hsmp_socket *sock)
>> +{
>> + struct acpi_buffer buf = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
>> + union acpi_object *guid, *mailbox_package;
>> + union acpi_object *dsd;
>> + acpi_status status;
>> + int ret = 0;
>> + int j;
>> +
>> + status = acpi_evaluate_object_typed(ACPI_HANDLE(sock->dev), "_DSD", NULL,
>> + &buf, ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE);
>> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
>> + dev_err(sock->dev, "Failed to read mailbox reg offsets from DSD table, err: %s\n",
>> + acpi_format_exception(status));
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + dsd = buf.pointer;
>> +
>> + /* HSMP _DSD property should contain 2 objects.
>> + * 1. guid which is an acpi object of type ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER
>> + * 2. mailbox which is an acpi object of type ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE
>> + * This mailbox object contains 3 more acpi objects of type
>> + * ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE for holding msgid, msgresp, msgarg offsets
>> + * these packages inturn contain 2 acpi objects of type
>> + * ACPI_TYPE_STRING and ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER
>> + */
>> + if (!dsd || dsd->type != ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE || dsd->package.count != 2) {
>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>> + goto free_buf;
>> + }
>> +
>> + guid = &dsd->package.elements[0];
>> + mailbox_package = &dsd->package.elements[1];
>> + if (!is_acpi_hsmp_uuid(guid) || mailbox_package->type != ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE) {
>> + dev_err(sock->dev, "Invalid hsmp _DSD table data\n");
>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>> + goto free_buf;
>> + }
>> +
>> + for (j = 0; j < mailbox_package->package.count; j++) {
>> + union acpi_object *msgobj, *msgstr, *msgint;
>> +
>> + msgobj = &mailbox_package->package.elements[j];
>> + msgstr = &msgobj->package.elements[0];
>> + msgint = &msgobj->package.elements[1];
>> +
>> + /* package should have 1 string and 1 integer object */
>> + if (msgobj->type != ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE ||
>> + msgstr->type != ACPI_TYPE_STRING ||
>> + msgint->type != ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) {
>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>> + goto free_buf;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!strncmp(msgstr->string.pointer, MSG_IDOFF_STR,
>> + msgstr->string.length)) {
>> + sock->mbinfo.msg_id_off = msgint->integer.value;
>> + } else if (!strncmp(msgstr->string.pointer, MSG_RESPOFF_STR,
>> + msgstr->string.length)) {
>> + sock->mbinfo.msg_resp_off = msgint->integer.value;
>> + } else if (!strncmp(msgstr->string.pointer, MSG_ARGOFF_STR,
>> + msgstr->string.length)) {
>> + sock->mbinfo.msg_arg_off = msgint->integer.value;
>> + } else {
>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>> + goto free_buf;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!sock->mbinfo.msg_id_off || !sock->mbinfo.msg_resp_off ||
>> + !sock->mbinfo.msg_arg_off)
>> + ret = -EINVAL;
> These smell like return -ENODEV or -ENOENT but I don't have an idea what
> ACPI related funcs typically return.
acpi_object is an input to this module, in that sense, we are returning
EINVAL.
I compared with few acpi drivers and accordingly changed to ENODEV and
ENOENT in some places and retained EINVAL in some places.
I will address the other comments also and send patch set 3.
>> +free_buf:
>> + ACPI_FREE(buf.pointer);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int hsmp_read_acpi_crs(struct hsmp_socket *sock)
>> +{
>> + acpi_status status;
>> +
>> + status = acpi_walk_resources(ACPI_HANDLE(sock->dev), METHOD_NAME__CRS,
>> + hsmp_resource, sock);
>> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
>> + dev_err(sock->dev, "Failed to look up MP1 base address from CRS method, err: %s\n",
>> + acpi_format_exception(status));
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> + if (!sock->mbinfo.base_addr || !sock->mbinfo.size)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + /* The mapped region should be un cached */
>> + sock->virt_base_addr = devm_ioremap_uc(sock->dev, sock->mbinfo.base_addr,
>> + sock->mbinfo.size);
>> + if (!sock->virt_base_addr) {
>> + dev_err(sock->dev, "Failed to ioremap MP1 base address\n");
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Parse the ACPI table to read the data */
>> +static int hsmp_parse_acpi_table(struct device *dev, u16 sock_ind)
>> +{
>> + struct hsmp_socket *sock = &plat_dev.sock[sock_ind];
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + sock->sock_ind = sock_ind;
>> + sock->dev = dev;
>> + plat_dev.is_acpi_device = true;
>> +
>> + sema_init(&sock->hsmp_sem, 1);
>> +
>> + /* Read MP1 base address from CRS method */
>> + ret = hsmp_read_acpi_crs(sock);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + /* Read mailbox offsets from DSD table */
>> + return hsmp_read_acpi_dsd(sock);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int hsmp_cache_proto_ver(u16 sock_ind)
>> {
>> struct hsmp_message msg = { 0 };
>> int ret;
>>
>> msg.msg_id = HSMP_GET_PROTO_VER;
>> - msg.sock_ind = 0;
>> + msg.sock_ind = sock_ind;
>> msg.response_sz = hsmp_msg_desc_table[HSMP_GET_PROTO_VER].response_sz;
>>
>> ret = hsmp_send_message(&msg);
>> @@ -532,28 +741,62 @@ static int initialize_platdev(struct device *dev)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +static const struct acpi_device_id amd_hsmp_acpi_ids[] = {
>> + {ACPI_HSMP_DEVICE_HID, 0},
>> + {}
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, amd_hsmp_acpi_ids);
>> +
>> static int hsmp_pltdrv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> + struct acpi_device *adev;
>> + u16 sock_ind = 0;
>> int ret;
>>
>> - plat_dev.sock = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
>> - (plat_dev.num_sockets * sizeof(struct hsmp_socket)),
>> - GFP_KERNEL);
>> - if (!plat_dev.sock)
>> - return -ENOMEM;
>> -
>> - ret = initialize_platdev(&pdev->dev);
>> - if (ret)
>> - return ret;
>> + /*
>> + * On ACPI supported BIOS, there is an ACPI HSMP device added for
>> + * each socket, so the per socket probing, but the memory allocated for
>> + * sockets should be contiguous to access it as an array,
>> + * Hence allocate memory for all the sockets at once instead of allocating
>> + * on each probe.
>> + */
>> + if (!plat_dev.is_probed) {
>> + plat_dev.sock = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
>> + (plat_dev.num_sockets * sizeof(struct hsmp_socket)),
>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!plat_dev.sock)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + }
>>
>> - plat_dev.hsmp_device.name = HSMP_CDEV_NAME;
>> - plat_dev.hsmp_device.minor = MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR;
>> - plat_dev.hsmp_device.fops = &hsmp_fops;
>> - plat_dev.hsmp_device.parent = &pdev->dev;
>> - plat_dev.hsmp_device.nodename = HSMP_DEVNODE_NAME;
>> - plat_dev.hsmp_device.mode = 0644;
>> + adev = ACPI_COMPANION(&pdev->dev);
>> + if (adev && !acpi_match_device_ids(adev, amd_hsmp_acpi_ids)) {
>> + ret = hsmp_get_uid(&pdev->dev, &sock_ind);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> + if (sock_ind >= plat_dev.num_sockets)
>> + return -EINVAL;
> Again, caller didn't provide invalid value here either.
>
>> + ret = hsmp_parse_acpi_table(&pdev->dev, sock_ind);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to parse ACPI table\n");
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> + /* Test the hsmp interface */
>> + ret = hsmp_test(sock_ind, 0xDEADBEEF);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "HSMP test message failed on Fam:%x model:%x\n",
>> + boot_cpu_data.x86, boot_cpu_data.x86_model);
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Is HSMP disabled in BIOS ?\n");
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> + } else {
>> + ret = initialize_platdev(&pdev->dev);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to init HSMP mailbox\n");
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> + }
>>
>> - ret = hsmp_cache_proto_ver();
>> + ret = hsmp_cache_proto_ver(sock_ind);
>> if (ret) {
>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to read HSMP protocol version\n");
>> return ret;
>> @@ -563,12 +806,35 @@ static int hsmp_pltdrv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> if (ret)
>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to create HSMP sysfs interface\n");
>>
>> - return misc_register(&plat_dev.hsmp_device);
>> + if (!plat_dev.is_probed) {
>> + plat_dev.hsmp_device.name = HSMP_CDEV_NAME;
>> + plat_dev.hsmp_device.minor = MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR;
>> + plat_dev.hsmp_device.fops = &hsmp_fops;
>> + plat_dev.hsmp_device.parent = &pdev->dev;
>> + plat_dev.hsmp_device.nodename = HSMP_DEVNODE_NAME;
>> + plat_dev.hsmp_device.mode = 0644;
>> +
>> + ret = misc_register(&plat_dev.hsmp_device);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + plat_dev.is_probed = true;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> }
>>
>> static void hsmp_pltdrv_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> - misc_deregister(&plat_dev.hsmp_device);
>> + /*
>> + * We register only one misc_device even on multi socket system.
>> + * So, deregister should happen only once.
>> + */
>> + if (plat_dev.is_probed) {
>> + misc_deregister(&plat_dev.hsmp_device);
>> + plat_dev.is_probed = false;
>> + }
>> }
>>
>> static struct platform_driver amd_hsmp_driver = {
>> @@ -576,6 +842,7 @@ static struct platform_driver amd_hsmp_driver = {
>> .remove_new = hsmp_pltdrv_remove,
>> .driver = {
>> .name = DRIVER_NAME,
>> + .acpi_match_table = amd_hsmp_acpi_ids,
>> },
>> };
>>
>> @@ -618,9 +885,11 @@ static int __init hsmp_plt_init(void)
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>>
>> - ret = hsmp_plat_dev_register();
>> - if (ret)
>> - platform_driver_unregister(&amd_hsmp_driver);
>> + if (!plat_dev.is_acpi_device) {
>> + ret = hsmp_plat_dev_register();
>> + if (ret)
>> + platform_driver_unregister(&amd_hsmp_driver);
>> + }
>>
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
> --
> i.
Thanks and Regards,
Suma
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-21 10:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-20 16:55 [PATCH v2 0/7] platform/x86: Add ACPI probing support for HSMP Suma Hegde
2023-12-20 16:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] platform/x86: Move hsmp_test to probe Suma Hegde
2023-12-20 17:04 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-12-20 16:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] platform/x86: Cache pci_dev in struct hsmp_socket Suma Hegde
2023-12-20 17:00 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-12-20 16:55 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] platform/x86: Create static func to handle platdev Suma Hegde
2023-12-20 17:08 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-12-20 16:55 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] platform/x86: Define a struct to hold mailbox regs Suma Hegde
2023-12-20 17:12 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-12-20 16:55 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] platform/x86: Move dev from platdev to hsmp_socket Suma Hegde
2023-12-20 17:18 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-12-20 17:20 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-12-20 16:55 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] platform/x86: Convert to ACPI based probing Suma Hegde
2023-12-20 17:34 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-12-21 10:27 ` Hegde, Suma [this message]
2023-12-20 16:55 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] platform/x86: Non-ACPI support for AMD F1A_M00~0Fh Suma Hegde
2023-12-20 17:40 ` Ilpo Järvinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=11fcc515-679c-c1ea-2bf3-862c875e1044@amd.com \
--to=suma.hegde@amd.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=nchatrad@amd.com \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox