From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Perches Subject: Re: [PATCH] intel_ips: quieten "power or thermal limit exceeded" messages Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 13:47:05 -0700 Message-ID: <1285274825.25928.19.camel@Joe-Laptop> References: <4C770299.6000708@cesarb.net> <1282869660.1836.5.camel@Joe-Laptop> <4C77171E.6060008@cesarb.net> <1282894751.1836.41.camel@Joe-Laptop> <4C784650.2030200@cesarb.net> <1282962104.1946.179.camel@Joe-Laptop> <20100923133132.3faae5b3@jbarnes-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100923133132.3faae5b3@jbarnes-desktop> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jesse Barnes Cc: Cesar Eduardo Barros , Matthew Garrett , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: platform-driver-x86.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 13:31 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > I think the programmed limits are valid if they're nonzero and less > than one of the available default limits. If they're not valid, we > should just use the default values. I was thinking something like the > below for MCP, but Joe you may want to just update your patch instead > since it's more complete. You have my patch yes? You can probably integrate and validate it better than I can with your proposed change. I don't have any of the hardware to test. If I can otherwise help somehow, let me know. cheers, Joe