From: joeyli <jlee@suse.com>
To: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maxtram95@gmail.com>
Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, jlee@novell.com, mjg@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] msi-laptop: Code cleanups
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 11:11:50 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1354072310.21227.962.camel@linux-s257.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1353796141-1470-4-git-send-email-maxtram95@gmail.com>
於 日,2012-11-25 於 00:28 +0200,Maxim Mikityanskiy 提到:
> Replaced msi_init_rfkill() by msi_update_rfkill(), removed delays by
> replacing delayed works by just works and made msi_laptop_i8042_filter()
> filter out KEY_TOUCHPAD_TOGGLE when sending KEY_TOUCHPAD_ON and
> KEY_TOUCHPAD_OFF.
Please separate to 2 patches, one for touchpad key and other one for
rfkill.
And,
I am not agree for the clean up to msi_init_rfkill unless it causes
problem on U90/U100. Did you find any issue on U90/U100?
I delay 1 magic second for msi_rfkill_init because there have other MSI
model need a delay time after we set SCM mode through write EC
register.
So, please don't change the code for msi_init_rfkill delay work, just
keep it works with other MSI shipping machines.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maxtram95@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/msi-laptop.c | 67 ++++++++++++++-------------------------
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/msi-laptop.c b/drivers/platform/x86/msi-laptop.c
> index 7ba107a..3b6f494 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/msi-laptop.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/msi-laptop.c
> @@ -600,8 +600,23 @@ static const struct rfkill_ops rfkill_threeg_ops = {
> .set_block = rfkill_threeg_set
> };
>
> +static void msi_update_rfkill(struct work_struct *ignored)
> +{
> + get_wireless_state_ec_standard();
> +
> + if (rfk_wlan)
> + rfkill_set_sw_state(rfk_wlan, !wlan_s);
> + if (rfk_bluetooth)
> + rfkill_set_sw_state(rfk_bluetooth, !bluetooth_s);
> + if (rfk_threeg)
> + rfkill_set_sw_state(rfk_threeg, !threeg_s);
> +}
> +static DECLARE_WORK(msi_rfkill_work, msi_update_rfkill);
> +
> static void rfkill_cleanup(void)
> {
> + cancel_work_sync(&msi_rfkill_work);
> +
> if (rfk_bluetooth) {
> rfkill_unregister(rfk_bluetooth);
> rfkill_destroy(rfk_bluetooth);
> @@ -618,19 +633,6 @@ static void rfkill_cleanup(void)
> }
> }
>
> -static void msi_update_rfkill(struct work_struct *ignored)
> -{
> - get_wireless_state_ec_standard();
> -
> - if (rfk_wlan)
> - rfkill_set_sw_state(rfk_wlan, !wlan_s);
> - if (rfk_bluetooth)
> - rfkill_set_sw_state(rfk_bluetooth, !bluetooth_s);
> - if (rfk_threeg)
> - rfkill_set_sw_state(rfk_threeg, !threeg_s);
> -}
> -static DECLARE_DELAYED_WORK(msi_rfkill_work, msi_update_rfkill);
> -
> static void msi_send_touchpad_key(struct work_struct *ignored)
> {
> u8 rdata;
> @@ -644,7 +646,7 @@ static void msi_send_touchpad_key(struct work_struct *ignored)
> (rdata & MSI_STANDARD_EC_TOUCHPAD_MASK) ?
> KEY_TOUCHPAD_ON : KEY_TOUCHPAD_OFF, 1, true);
> }
> -static DECLARE_DELAYED_WORK(msi_touchpad_work, msi_send_touchpad_key);
> +static DECLARE_WORK(msi_touchpad_work, msi_send_touchpad_key);
>
> static bool msi_laptop_i8042_filter(unsigned char data, unsigned char str,
> struct serio *port)
> @@ -662,14 +664,16 @@ static bool msi_laptop_i8042_filter(unsigned char data, unsigned char str,
> extended = false;
> switch (data) {
> case 0xE4:
> - schedule_delayed_work(&msi_touchpad_work,
> - round_jiffies_relative(0.5 * HZ));
> - break;
> + schedule_work(&msi_touchpad_work);
Don't remove the 0.5 magic delay, please! It will cause other shipped
MSI machines got problem could not capture the real change of EC
register.
> + case 0x64:
> + /* Filter out KEY_TOUCHPAD_TOGGLE and send only
> + * KEY_TOUCHPAD_ON and KEY_TOUCHPAD_OFF
> + */
> + return true;
Why this patch filter out 0x64 key? What's the scan code emitted when
press the touchpad on/off Fn key on U100? Does it emit
KEY_TOUCHPAD_TOGGLE and KEY_TOUCHPAD_ON/OFF at the same time?
> case 0x54:
> case 0x62:
> case 0x76:
> - schedule_delayed_work(&msi_rfkill_work,
> - round_jiffies_relative(0.5 * HZ));
> + schedule_work(&msi_rfkill_work);
> break;
> }
> }
> @@ -677,31 +681,11 @@ static bool msi_laptop_i8042_filter(unsigned char data, unsigned char str,
> return false;
> }
>
> -static void msi_init_rfkill(struct work_struct *ignored)
> -{
> - if (rfk_wlan) {
> - rfkill_set_sw_state(rfk_wlan, !wlan_s);
> - rfkill_wlan_set(NULL, !wlan_s);
> - }
> - if (rfk_bluetooth) {
> - rfkill_set_sw_state(rfk_bluetooth, !bluetooth_s);
> - rfkill_bluetooth_set(NULL, !bluetooth_s);
> - }
> - if (rfk_threeg) {
> - rfkill_set_sw_state(rfk_threeg, !threeg_s);
> - rfkill_threeg_set(NULL, !threeg_s);
> - }
> -}
> -static DECLARE_DELAYED_WORK(msi_rfkill_init, msi_init_rfkill);
> -
> static int rfkill_init(struct platform_device *sdev)
> {
> /* add rfkill */
> int retval;
>
> - /* keep the hardware wireless state */
> - get_wireless_state_ec_standard();
> -
> rfk_bluetooth = rfkill_alloc("msi-bluetooth", &sdev->dev,
> RFKILL_TYPE_BLUETOOTH,
> &rfkill_bluetooth_ops, NULL);
> @@ -736,8 +720,7 @@ static int rfkill_init(struct platform_device *sdev)
> }
>
> /* schedule to run rfkill state initial */
> - schedule_delayed_work(&msi_rfkill_init,
> - round_jiffies_relative(1 * HZ));
> + schedule_work(&msi_rfkill_work);
>
> return 0;
>
> @@ -951,7 +934,6 @@ fail_platform_device2:
>
> if (load_scm_model) {
> i8042_remove_filter(msi_laptop_i8042_filter);
> - cancel_delayed_work_sync(&msi_rfkill_work);
> rfkill_cleanup();
> }
> platform_device_del(msipf_device);
> @@ -976,7 +958,6 @@ static void __exit msi_cleanup(void)
> if (load_scm_model) {
> i8042_remove_filter(msi_laptop_i8042_filter);
> msi_laptop_input_destroy();
> - cancel_delayed_work_sync(&msi_rfkill_work);
> rfkill_cleanup();
> }
>
Thanks a lot!
Joey Lee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-28 3:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-24 22:28 [PATCH 0/6] msi-laptop: Add MSI Wind U90/U100 support Maxim Mikityanskiy
2012-11-24 22:28 ` [PATCH 1/6] msi-laptop: Use proper return codes instead of -1 Maxim Mikityanskiy
2012-11-28 2:07 ` joeyli
2012-11-24 22:28 ` [PATCH 2/6] msi-laptop: Work around gcc warning Maxim Mikityanskiy
2012-11-28 2:47 ` joeyli
2012-11-24 22:28 ` [PATCH 3/6] msi-laptop: Code cleanups Maxim Mikityanskiy
2012-11-28 3:11 ` joeyli [this message]
2012-11-28 17:32 ` Maxim Mikityanskiy
2012-11-29 8:10 ` joeyli
2012-11-29 16:31 ` Maxim Mikityanskiy
2012-11-24 22:28 ` [PATCH 4/6] msi-laptop: Add MSI Wind U90/U100 support Maxim Mikityanskiy
2012-11-28 3:32 ` joeyli
2012-11-28 17:41 ` Maxim Mikityanskiy
2012-11-29 4:14 ` joeyli
2012-11-29 16:31 ` Maxim Mikityanskiy
2012-11-24 22:29 ` [PATCH 5/6] msi-laptop: Add missing ABI documentation Maxim Mikityanskiy
2012-11-28 3:36 ` joeyli
2012-11-24 22:29 ` [PATCH 6/6] Add MSI Wind WMI support Maxim Mikityanskiy
2012-11-27 8:14 ` joeyli
2012-11-27 8:50 ` Corentin Chary
2012-11-27 15:55 ` Maxim Mikityanskiy
2012-11-27 16:34 ` Corentin Chary
2012-11-27 16:49 ` Maxim Mikityanskiy
2012-11-27 23:20 ` joeyli
2012-11-28 18:03 ` Maxim Mikityanskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1354072310.21227.962.camel@linux-s257.site \
--to=jlee@suse.com \
--cc=jlee@novell.com \
--cc=maxtram95@gmail.com \
--cc=mjg@redhat.com \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox