From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sean Christopherson Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 08/13] x86, sgx: added ENCLS wrappers Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 06:12:35 -0700 Message-ID: <1529500355.9779.51.camel@intel.com> References: <20180608171216.26521-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <20180608171216.26521-9-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20180608171216.26521-9-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jarkko Sakkinen , x86@kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org Cc: dave.hansen@intel.com, nhorman@redhat.com, npmccallum@redhat.com, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , "open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" , "open list:INTEL SGX" List-Id: platform-driver-x86.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2018-06-08 at 19:09 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > This commit adds wrappers for Intel(R) SGX ENCLS opcode functionality. > > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen > --- >  arch/x86/include/asm/sgx.h | 198 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >  1 file changed, 198 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/sgx.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/sgx.h > index fa3e6e0eb8af..a2f727f85b91 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/sgx.h > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/sgx.h > @@ -10,6 +10,10 @@ >  #ifndef _ASM_X86_SGX_H >  #define _ASM_X86_SGX_H >   > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include >  #include >   >  #define SGX_CPUID 0x12 > @@ -20,6 +24,200 @@ enum sgx_cpuid { >   SGX_CPUID_EPC_BANKS = 2, >  }; >   > +enum sgx_commands { This should be something like "sgx_encls_leafs" and probably moved to sgx_arch.h (as Dave alluded to, these are architectural values). "sgx_commands" is not accurate (they're only the cpl0 "commands") and will have collision issues in the future, e.g. with the ENCLV instruction and its leafs. > + ECREATE = 0x0, > + EADD = 0x1, > + EINIT = 0x2, > + EREMOVE = 0x3, > + EDGBRD = 0x4, > + EDGBWR = 0x5, > + EEXTEND = 0x6, Even though it's not used in the code (yet...), I think ELDB, leaf 0x7, should be defined here for completeness. > + ELDU = 0x8, > + EBLOCK = 0x9, > + EPA = 0xA, > + EWB = 0xB, > + ETRACK = 0xC, > + EAUG = 0xD, > + EMODPR = 0xE, > + EMODT = 0xF, > +};