From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
irenic.rajneesh@gmail.com, david.e.box@intel.com,
ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com, rajvi.jingar@linux.intel.com
Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Fix recent instances of -Wmissing-prototypes
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2023 10:07:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1e88b853-7d72-4e4a-8a91-70d945024a96@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231222-intel-pmc-missing-prototypes-v1-0-3f0d47377d4c@kernel.org>
Hi,
On 12/22/23 19:27, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> As reported by Stephen at [1], there are a few instances of
> -Wmissing-prototypes, which break the build with CONFIG_WERROR=y. This
> series marks these functions as static because they are not used outside
> of these translation units.
>
> Feel free to squash these into the original changes if the branch is not
> set in stone.
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231222135412.6bd796cc@canb.auug.org.au/
Thank you for your patch-series, I've squashed the patches into
the original commits in my review-hans branch:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-drivers-x86.git/log/?h=review-hans
Note it will show up in my review-hans branch once I've pushed my
local branch there, which might take a while.
Once I've run some tests on this branch the patches there will be
pushed to the platform-drivers-x86/for-next branch and eventually
will be included in the pdx86 pull-request to Linus for the next
merge-window.
Regards,
Hans
> ---
> Nathan Chancellor (2):
> platform/x86/intel/pmc: Mark arl_d3_fixup() and arl_resume() as static
> platform/x86/intel/pmc: Mark lnl_d3_fixup() and lnl_resume() as static
>
> drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/arl.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/lnl.c | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> ---
> base-commit: 119652b855e6c96676406ee9a7f535f4db4e8eff
> change-id: 20231222-intel-pmc-missing-prototypes-8fb5014b16b8
>
> Best regards,
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-28 9:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-22 18:27 [PATCH 0/2] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Fix recent instances of -Wmissing-prototypes Nathan Chancellor
2023-12-22 18:27 ` [PATCH 1/2] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Mark arl_d3_fixup() and arl_resume() as static Nathan Chancellor
2023-12-22 18:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Mark lnl_d3_fixup() and lnl_resume() " Nathan Chancellor
2023-12-28 9:07 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1e88b853-7d72-4e4a-8a91-70d945024a96@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=david.e.box@intel.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=irenic.rajneesh@gmail.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rajvi.jingar@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox