From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "John W. Linville" Subject: Re: [Regression] Problem with rfkill on 2.6.38 Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 09:23:28 -0400 Message-ID: <20110624132327.GA4793@tuxdriver.com> References: <1304930195.3475.17.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <4DC81FC7.9040503@colin.guthr.ie> <20110509171144.GA7194@srcf.ucam.org> <4DC9072D.4030103@colin.guthr.ie> <4E046CD5.2070709@colin.guthr.ie> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:33883 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756607Ab1FXNbn (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jun 2011 09:31:43 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: platform-driver-x86-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Keng-Y=FC?= Lin Cc: Colin Guthrie , Matthew Garrett , Johannes Berg , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Backlund On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 08:29:33PM +0800, Keng-Y=FC Lin wrote: > Sorry for the late reply. >=20 > After looking into this a bit I agree with you the patch should be re= verted. >=20 > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Colin Guthrie = wrote: > > I supplied all this info before here: > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general/68758 > > > > Anything else I can do to move this forward? > > >=20 > I am happy to form the revert patch if necessary. Please do so -- I'm sure Matthew would appreciate it. :-) John --=20 John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.