From: Murray Campbell <murray@sonology.net>
To: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org
Subject: asus-wmi: wlan rfkill on eee pc 1015PEM possible regression?
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 16:26:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130308002649.GA4232@wavelet> (raw)
Hi,
I have an ASUS Eee PC 1015PEM and, on upgrading from kernel 3.5.7 to
3.6.11 noticed that the rfkill behaviour stopped working the way I was
expecting.
I have git-bisect-ed it down to the following commit:
a50bd128f28cf81c1250874fc53728e113f12957
which certainly looks relevant.
I first noticed the problem because the WLAN rfkill toggle button
(Fn+F2) stopped toggling the WLAN LED. Also, it won't enable the WLAN
if it is disabled in the BIOS.
Prior to the change 'rfkill list' would show two devices: 0: "asus-wlan"
and 1: "phy0". Using either the button or 'rfkill (un)block all' would
toggle the blocked state from "no,no; no,no" to "yes,no; yes,yes" where
each pair is soft/hard and the first pair is the asus-wlan, the second
the phy0. Each time the phy0 hard block status would take a second or
two to change.
This worked regardless of the state in the BIOS and would appropriately
toggle the WLAN LED.
After the commit the two devices are switched: phy0 is number 0 and
asus-wlan is number 1. The hard block status of both devices is
impossible to change with either 'rfkill' or the button. The asus-wlan
device is always not hard-blocked, the phy0 hard-block always keeps the
status assigned in the BIOS. The soft-block state changes
appropriately. The WLAN LED never changes.
If the WLAN is disabled in the BIOS it is never possible to enable it
without a reboot and I am wondering if the device is ever switched off
properly if it is enabled in the BIOS.
Is this expected behaviour? If not I am more than willing to
investigate further if anyone can suggest a line of enquiry.
Thank you,
Murray Campbell <murray@sonology.net>
reply other threads:[~2013-03-08 0:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130308002649.GA4232@wavelet \
--to=murray@sonology.net \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox