From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Darren Hart Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] eeepc-laptop: clean up coding style Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 09:46:03 -0700 Message-ID: <20140919164603.GB34042@vmdeb7> References: <1410990447-3210-1-git-send-email-fransklaver@gmail.com> <1410990447-3210-2-git-send-email-fransklaver@gmail.com> <1410991612.4290.10.camel@joe-AO725> <642509cf-05f2-47f4-be2e-a3cfb9a93a04@email.android.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <642509cf-05f2-47f4-be2e-a3cfb9a93a04@email.android.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Frans Klaver Cc: Joe Perches , Corentin Chary , Rafael Wysocki , Greg Kroah-Hartman , acpi4asus-user@lists.sourceforge.net, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: platform-driver-x86.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 07:01:25AM +0200, Frans Klaver wrote: > On 18 September 2014 00:06:52 CEST, Joe Perches wrote: > >On Wed, 2014-09-17 at 23:47 +0200, Frans Klaver wrote: > >> Correct indentation and brace usage to comply with > >> Documentation/CodingStyle. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Frans Klaver > >> --- > >> drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c | 8 +++++--- > >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c > >b/drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c > >> index 3095d38..653999e 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c > >> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c > >> @@ -544,7 +544,7 @@ static int eeepc_led_init(struct eeepc_laptop > >*eeepc) > >> eeepc->tpd_led.name = "eeepc::touchpad"; > >> eeepc->tpd_led.brightness_set = tpd_led_set; > >> if (get_acpi(eeepc, CM_ASL_TPD) >= 0) /* if method is available */ > >> - eeepc->tpd_led.brightness_get = tpd_led_get; > >> + eeepc->tpd_led.brightness_get = tpd_led_get; > >> eeepc->tpd_led.max_brightness = 1; > >> > >> rv = led_classdev_register(&eeepc->platform_device->dev, > >> @@ -692,8 +692,9 @@ static int eeepc_register_rfkill_notifier(struct > >eeepc_laptop *eeepc, > >> * changed during setup. > >> */ > >> eeepc_rfkill_hotplug(eeepc, handle); > >> - } else > >> + } else { > >> return -ENODEV; > >> + } > >> > >> return 0; > >> } > > > >This sort of code: > > > > if (foo) { > > [ do_something ] > > } else > > return -ERRVAL; > > > >is generally better rewritten as: > > > > if (!foo) > > return -ERRVAL; > > > > [ do_something ] > > > >This gives immediacy to the error handler and > >as well reduces unnecessary indentation. > > I fully agree. > > Darren, do you still take this in one patch? I'll take the cleanup patch as is. I'm happy to take a separate patch to improve the code flow. -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center