From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Darren Hart Subject: Re: dell_rbtn - kernel panic at boot... Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 21:09:30 -0700 Message-ID: <20150527040930.GA14480@fury.dvhart.com> References: <5875.1432260403@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <201505230305.36633@pali> <20150525044432.GA38428@fury.dvhart.com> <20150525144014.GC23037@pali> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:54360 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750751AbbE0EJd (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 May 2015 00:09:33 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150525144014.GC23037@pali> Sender: platform-driver-x86-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Pali =?iso-8859-1?Q?Roh=E1r?= Cc: Dmitry Torokhov , Valdis Kletnieks , lkml , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, Matthew Garrett , Greg Kroah-Hartman On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 04:40:14PM +0200, Pali Roh=E1r wrote: > On Sunday 24 May 2015 21:44:32 Darren Hart wrote: > > On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 03:05:36AM +0200, Pali Roh=E1r wrote: > > > On Saturday 23 May 2015 00:53:16 Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Valdis Kletnieks > > > >=20 > > > > wrote: > > > > > So after I made both config variables =3Dy, the resulting ker= nel > > > > > built, but died a glorious death at boot. > > > >=20 > > > > I guess if both are built-in then, according to link order, > > > > dell-laptop starts first, before dell-rbtn, and dies in > > > > dell_rbtn_notifier_register() in call to > > > > driver_for_each_device(&rbtn_driver.drv, ...) because rbtn_driv= er has > > > > not been registered yet and thus half-initlalized. > > > >=20 > > > > Thanks. > > >=20 > > > pr_debug() messages could be useful... but no idea if we can get = them. > > >=20 > > > Is there any way to fix that dependency race condition? Could=20 > > > driver_attach() function call help? > >=20 > > I believe you can avoid this by moving dell-rbtn earlier in the Mak= efile than > > dell-laptop - but this is fragile and a hack to resolve a dependenc= y problem. > >=20 >=20 > And what about that late_initcall() instead module_init() in dell-lap= top? > Will it fix this problem? >=20 No, because late_initcall() for modules is module_init(). See include/linux/init.h. --=20 Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center