From: "Michał Kępień" <kernel@kempniu.pl>
To: Alex Hung <alex.hung@canonical.com>
Cc: dvhart@infradead.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][V2] intel-hid: support 5 array button
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 15:16:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170127141604.GA1145@ozzy.nask.waw.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1485415981-20487-1-git-send-email-alex.hung@canonical.com>
> New firmwares include a feature called 5 button array that supports
> super key, volume up/down, rotation lock and power button. Especially,
Personally, I would drop the word "especially". It seems redundant.
> support for this feature is required to fix power button on some recent
> systems.
>
> This patch was tested on a Dell Latitude 7280.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Hung <alex.hung@canonical.com>
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/intel-hid.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 102 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel-hid.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel-hid.c
> index cb3ab2b..6e796a5 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel-hid.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel-hid.c
> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> /*
> - * Intel HID event driver for Windows 8
> + * Intel HID event & 5 button array driver
> *
> * Copyright (C) 2015 Alex Hung <alex.hung@canonical.com>
> * Copyright (C) 2015 Andrew Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
> @@ -57,8 +57,24 @@ static const struct key_entry intel_hid_keymap[] = {
> { KE_END },
> };
>
> +/* 5 button array notification value. */
> +static const struct key_entry intel_array_keymap[] = {
> + { KE_KEY, 0xC2, { KEY_LEFTMETA} }, /* Press */
> + { KE_IGNORE, 0xC3, { KEY_LEFTMETA} }, /* Release */
> + { KE_KEY, 0xC4, { KEY_VOLUMEUP} }, /* Press */
> + { KE_IGNORE, 0xC5, { KEY_VOLUMEUP} }, /* Release */
> + { KE_KEY, 0xC6, { KEY_VOLUMEDOWN} }, /* Press */
> + { KE_IGNORE, 0xC7, { KEY_VOLUMEDOWN} }, /* Release */
> + { KE_SW, 0xC8, { .sw = {SW_ROTATE_LOCK, 1} } }, /* Press */
> + { KE_SW, 0xC9, { .sw = {SW_ROTATE_LOCK, 0} } }, /* Release */
Comments in the last two lines are now misaligned with the rest.
Other than these two nitpicks (which IMHO are not worth a v3):
Reviewed-by: Michał Kępień <kernel@kempniu.pl>
> + { KE_KEY, 0xCE, { KEY_POWER} }, /* Press */
> + { KE_IGNORE, 0xCF, { KEY_POWER} }, /* Release */
> + { KE_END },
> +};
> +
> struct intel_hid_priv {
> struct input_dev *input_dev;
> + struct input_dev *array;
> };
>
> static int intel_hid_set_enable(struct device *device, int enable)
> @@ -78,15 +94,43 @@ static int intel_hid_set_enable(struct device *device, int enable)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void intel_button_array_enable(struct device *device, int enable)
> +{
> + struct intel_hid_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(device);
> + acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(device);
> + unsigned long long button_cap;
> + acpi_status status;
> +
> + if (!priv->array)
> + return;
> +
> + /* Query supported platform features */
> + status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "BTNC", NULL, &button_cap);
> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> + dev_warn(device, "failed to get button capability\n");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + /* Enable|disable features - power button is always enabled */
> + status = acpi_execute_simple_method(handle, "BTNE",
> + enable ? button_cap : 1);
> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> + dev_warn(device, "failed to set button capability\n");
> +}
> +
> static int intel_hid_pl_suspend_handler(struct device *device)
> {
> intel_hid_set_enable(device, 0);
> + intel_button_array_enable(device, 0);
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> static int intel_hid_pl_resume_handler(struct device *device)
> {
> intel_hid_set_enable(device, 1);
> + intel_button_array_enable(device, 1);
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -126,11 +170,43 @@ static int intel_hid_input_setup(struct platform_device *device)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int intel_button_array_input_setup(struct platform_device *device)
> +{
> + struct intel_hid_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&device->dev);
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* Setup input device for 5 button array */
> + priv->array = input_allocate_device();
> + if (!priv->array)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + ret = sparse_keymap_setup(priv->array, intel_array_keymap, NULL);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_free_array_device;
> +
> + priv->array->dev.parent = &device->dev;
> + priv->array->name = "Intel HID 5 button array";
> + priv->array->id.bustype = BUS_HOST;
> +
> + ret = input_register_device(priv->array);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_free_array_device;
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_free_array_device:
> + input_free_device(priv->array);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static void intel_hid_input_destroy(struct platform_device *device)
> {
> struct intel_hid_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&device->dev);
>
> input_unregister_device(priv->input_dev);
> +
> + if (priv->array)
> + input_unregister_device(priv->array);
> }
>
> static void notify_handler(acpi_handle handle, u32 event, void *context)
> @@ -140,10 +216,11 @@ static void notify_handler(acpi_handle handle, u32 event, void *context)
> unsigned long long ev_index;
> acpi_status status;
>
> - /* The platform spec only defines one event code: 0xC0. */
> + /* 0xC0 is for HID events, other values are for 5 button array */
> if (event != 0xc0) {
> - dev_warn(&device->dev, "received unknown event (0x%x)\n",
> - event);
> + if (!priv->array ||
> + !sparse_keymap_report_event(priv->array, event, 1, true))
> + dev_info(&device->dev, "unknown event 0x%x\n", event);
> return;
> }
>
> @@ -161,8 +238,8 @@ static void notify_handler(acpi_handle handle, u32 event, void *context)
> static int intel_hid_probe(struct platform_device *device)
> {
> acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(&device->dev);
> + unsigned long long event_cap, mode;
> struct intel_hid_priv *priv;
> - unsigned long long mode;
> acpi_status status;
> int err;
>
> @@ -193,6 +270,15 @@ static int intel_hid_probe(struct platform_device *device)
> return err;
> }
>
> + /* Setup 5 button array */
> + status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "HEBC", NULL, &event_cap);
> + if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status) && (event_cap & 0x20000)) {
> + dev_info(&device->dev, "platform supports 5 button array\n");
> + err = intel_button_array_input_setup(device);
> + if (err)
> + pr_err("Failed to setup Intel 5 button array hotkeys\n");
> + }
> +
> status = acpi_install_notify_handler(handle,
> ACPI_DEVICE_NOTIFY,
> notify_handler,
> @@ -206,6 +292,16 @@ static int intel_hid_probe(struct platform_device *device)
> if (err)
> goto err_remove_notify;
>
> + if (priv->array) {
> + intel_button_array_enable(&device->dev, 1);
> +
> + /* Call button load method to enable HID power button */
> + status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "BTNL", NULL, NULL);
> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> + dev_warn(&device->dev,
> + "failed to enable HID power button\n");
> + }
> +
> return 0;
>
> err_remove_notify:
> @@ -224,6 +320,7 @@ static int intel_hid_remove(struct platform_device *device)
> acpi_remove_notify_handler(handle, ACPI_DEVICE_NOTIFY, notify_handler);
> intel_hid_input_destroy(device);
> intel_hid_set_enable(&device->dev, 0);
> + intel_button_array_enable(&device->dev, 0);
>
> /*
> * Even if we failed to shut off the event stream, we can still
> --
> 2.7.4
>
--
Best regards,
Michał Kępień
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-27 14:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-26 7:33 [PATCH][V2] intel-hid: support 5 array button Alex Hung
2017-01-27 14:16 ` Michał Kępień [this message]
2017-02-04 1:14 ` Darren Hart
2017-02-04 1:26 ` Darren Hart
2017-02-04 16:06 ` Pali Rohár
2017-02-08 7:21 ` Michał Kępień
2017-02-08 8:17 ` Pali Rohár
2017-02-08 9:05 ` Alex Hung
2017-02-08 9:07 ` Pali Rohár
2017-02-04 14:58 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-02-09 2:22 ` Darren Hart
2017-02-09 3:09 ` Alex Hung
2017-02-09 19:56 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-02-17 2:43 ` Darren Hart
2017-02-08 8:54 ` Alex Hung
2017-02-13 11:43 ` Michał Kępień
2017-02-13 23:23 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-02-14 0:06 ` Alex Hung
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170127141604.GA1145@ozzy.nask.waw.pl \
--to=kernel@kempniu.pl \
--cc=alex.hung@canonical.com \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox