From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBLxJlwaWXFhA==?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] fujitsu_init() cleanup Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 08:19:38 +0100 Message-ID: <20170302071938.GA1081@ozzy.nask.waw.pl> References: <20170301081044.12141-1-kernel@kempniu.pl> <20170301223912.GF28335@marvin.atrad.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from mail-lf0-f68.google.com ([209.85.215.68]:35957 "EHLO mail-lf0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750771AbdCBI1z (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Mar 2017 03:27:55 -0500 Received: by mail-lf0-f68.google.com with SMTP id g70so4110119lfh.3 for ; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 00:27:54 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170301223912.GF28335@marvin.atrad.com.au> Sender: platform-driver-x86-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Jonathan Woithe Cc: Darren Hart , Andy Shevchenko , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 09:10:40AM +0100, Micha?? K??pie?? wrote: > > These patches should make fujitsu_init() a bit more palatable. No > > changes are made to platform device code yet, for clarity these will be > > posted in a separate series after this one gets applied. > > Thanks for these. As for the other series you posted I will endeavour to > review and test within the next 48 hours. I note the particular testing > requirements of patch 2/4. > > Could you confirm which git tree you've based these off? Sure, both series posted yesterday are based on dvhart/testing as that is where Alan's reworked series is currently applied. I posted them as separate series for consistency with previous submissions and also because they are independent, i.e. can be applied in any order. -- Best regards, Michał Kępień