From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Darren Hart Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] fujitsu-laptop: call_fext_func() cleanup Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 08:29:02 -0700 Message-ID: <20170405152902.GB27833@fury> References: <20170405065023.3267-1-kernel@kempniu.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170405065023.3267-1-kernel@kempniu.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: =?utf-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBLxJlwaWXFhA==?= Cc: Jonathan Woithe , Andy Shevchenko , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: platform-driver-x86.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 08:50:20AM +0200, Michał Kępień wrote: > This series contains a few cleanups for the call_fext_func() function. > Just as a reminder, please note that v1 of this series is currently > applied in testing. > > Changes from v1: > > - Update debug message logged by call_fext_func() to reflect code flow > changes introduced by patch 2/3. My apologies Michał, I misunderstood - I was thinking you had a second change to the 11 patch series, so I asked for a v2. This series is already in for-next, and we only rebase that for bugs that would be bad to leave in the history - like things that break bisecting. For this change, would you please send just 1 new patch on top of for-next? Again, I'm sorry that, my fault. -- Darren Hart VMware Open Source Technology Center