From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Darren Hart Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: wmi: Fix printing info about WDG structure Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 08:16:18 -0700 Message-ID: <20170608151618.GE32509@fury> References: <1495885877-7906-1-git-send-email-pali.rohar@gmail.com> <201705271517.30111@pali> <201705272248.13257@pali> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([65.50.211.133]:50871 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751509AbdFHPQU (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jun 2017 11:16:20 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: platform-driver-x86-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Pali =?iso-8859-1?Q?Roh=E1r?= , Andy Shevchenko , Andy Lutomirski , Platform Driver , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 11:49:22PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 11:48 PM, Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Saturday 27 May 2017 15:33:14 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >> On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Pali Rohár > >> wrote: > > >> Okay, got it. But on your opinion does it make sense to do > >> > >> pr_info("\tobject_id: %2pE\n", g->object_id); > >> > >> instead? > >> > >> For ASCII it will go as is previously, otherwise escaping would be > >> done. > > > > Both is OK for me. Do you want to send a new patch with %2pE? > > To me it looks slightly cleaner. I don't want to let this one fall through the cracks. Pali, is a new one coming? -- Darren Hart VMware Open Source Technology Center