X86 platform drivers
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: "Michał Kępień" <kernel@kempniu.pl>
Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	Jonathan Woithe <jwoithe@just42.net>,
	Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: fujitsu-laptop: Don't oops when FUJ02E3 is not presnt
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 16:25:15 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170919132515.GS4914@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170919040648.GA8426@kmp-mobile.hq.kempniu.pl>

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 06:06:48AM +0200, Michał Kępień wrote:
> > My Fujitsu-Siemens Lifebook S6120 doesn't have the FUJ02E3 device,
> > but it does have FUJ02B1. That means we do register the backlight
> > device (and it even seems to work), but the code will oops as soon
> > as we try to set the backlight brightness because it's trying to
> > call call_fext_func() with a NULL device. Let's just skip those
> > function calls when the FUJ02E3 device is not present.
> 
> Oh, the irony...  I have literally just sat down to dust off the patch
> series I have had queued for the past couple of months which makes the
> driver for FUJ02B1 a separate module depending on the FUJ02E3 driver.
> Then I saw your email and it is now clear that such a dependency is
> bogus.  AFAIR, until now everyone involved was expecting the FUJ02E3
> ACPI device to be present on all Fujitsu laptops.

BTW I just double checked my other laptops; S6010 doesn't have FUJ02E3
either, but S7110 does have it. So I have machines that go both ways,
in case you need help with testing something.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-09-19 13:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-18 20:00 [PATCH] platform/x86: fujitsu-laptop: Don't oops when FUJ02E3 is not presnt Ville Syrjala
2017-09-19  4:06 ` Michał Kępień
2017-09-19  4:21   ` Jonathan Woithe
2017-09-19  4:42     ` Michał Kępień
2017-09-19  8:20       ` Jonathan Woithe
2017-09-19 13:25   ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2018-02-10 21:33   ` Michał Kępień
2017-09-23  0:00 ` Darren Hart
2017-09-23  2:03   ` Jonathan Woithe
2017-09-23  9:08   ` Jonathan Woithe
2017-09-25 12:14     ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-09-25 13:16       ` Jonathan Woithe
2017-09-26  4:49   ` Michał Kępień
2017-09-26  5:32     ` Jonathan Woithe
     [not found]     ` <20171018151058.GL10981@intel.com>
2017-10-20 17:29       ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-25  4:51       ` Michał Kępień
2017-10-25 10:05         ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-29 22:57         ` Jonathan Woithe
2018-02-11 21:33           ` Michał Kępień
2017-09-27  6:56 ` Darren Hart
2017-09-27  7:27   ` Jonathan Woithe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170919132515.GS4914@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andy@infradead.org \
    --cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
    --cc=jwoithe@just42.net \
    --cc=kernel@kempniu.pl \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox