X86 platform drivers
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@dell.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, pali.rohar@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: dell-*wmi*: Relay failed initial probe to dependent drivers
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 17:56:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171103005632.GB7971@fury> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bdaec2635c4c38e869a5690db2426d7440222949.1509564191.git.mario.limonciello@dell.com>

On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 02:28:21PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> dell-wmi and dell-smbios-wmi are dependent upon dell-wmi-descriptor
> finishing probe successfully to probe themselves.
> 
> Currently if dell-wmi-descriptor fails probing in a non-recoverable way
> (such as invalid header) dell-wmi and dell-smbios-wmi will continue to
> try to redo probing due to deferred probing.
> 
> To solve this have the dependent drivers query the dell-wmi-descriptor
> driver whether the descriptor has been determined valid. The possible
> results are:
> -EPROBE_DEFER: Descriptor not yet probed, dependent driver should wait
>  and use deferred probing
> < 0: Descriptor probed, invalid.  Dependent driver should return an
>  error.
> 0: Successful descriptor probe, dependent driver can continue
> 
> Successful descriptor probe still doesn't mean that the descriptor driver
> is necessarily bound at the time of initialization of dependent driver.
> Userspace can unbind the driver, so all methods used from driver
> should still be verified to return success values otherwise deferred
> probing be used.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@dell.com>

> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/dell-wmi-descriptor.c b/drivers/platform/x86/dell-wmi-descriptor.c
> index 3204c408e261..33c6c7d66f8c 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/dell-wmi-descriptor.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/dell-wmi-descriptor.c
> @@ -26,9 +26,16 @@ struct descriptor_priv {
>  	u32 interface_version;
>  	u32 size;
>  };
> +static int descriptor_valid;

This initializes to 0, which I believe creates an odd race window between when
this init is called and when the first driver calls
dell_wmi_get_descriptor_valid(). Seems like initializing to -EPROBE_DEFER here
in the declaration would be a better right approach.

-- 
Darren Hart
VMware Open Source Technology Center

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-03  0:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-01 19:28 [PATCH] platform/x86: dell-*wmi*: Relay failed initial probe to dependent drivers Mario Limonciello
2017-11-03  0:56 ` Darren Hart [this message]
2017-11-03 14:42   ` Mario.Limonciello

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171103005632.GB7971@fury \
    --to=dvhart@infradead.org \
    --cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mario.limonciello@dell.com \
    --cc=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox