From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/11] Intel SGX Driver
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 00:20:28 +0200
Message-ID: <20171120222028.tugaad4bsj7vbm7i@linux.intel.com>
References: <20171113194528.28557-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1711151127570.1805@nanos>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1711151127570.1805@nanos>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: intel-sgx-kernel-dev@lists.01.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, x86@kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
List-Id: platform-driver-x86.vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 11:35:42AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> 
> Any reason why you did not CC the x86 maintainers and other x86 developers
> who have had opinions on the first attempt to get SGX into the kernel?
> 
> This is not some driver for a random peripheral. This has substantional
> effects. I'm assuming you simply forgot or were not aware, but this is not
> the way this works.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	tglx

I'll CC v6 to x86 maintainers. I'm sorry about this.

/Jarkko