From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarkko Sakkinen Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 11/13] platform/x86: Intel SGX driver Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 21:37:44 +0300 Message-ID: <20180910183744.GB20225@linux.intel.com> References: <20180827185507.17087-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <20180827185507.17087-12-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <20180905173355.GE11368@linux.intel.com> <20180906092100.GA27302@linux.intel.com> <5137f85388e26ea1ed46b34901b0f18540aee7cb.camel@perches.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5137f85388e26ea1ed46b34901b0f18540aee7cb.camel@perches.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Joe Perches Cc: Miguel Ojeda , Andy Shevchenko , "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" , Platform Driver , Dave Hansen , sean.j.christopherson@intel.com, nhorman@redhat.com, npmccallum@redhat.com, linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, serge.ayoun@intel.com, shay.katz-zamir@intel.com, "Siddha, Suresh B" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Darren Hart , Andy Shevchenko , Herbert Xu , Eric Biggers , Linux Kernel Mailing List List-Id: platform-driver-x86.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 05:50:01PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Thu, 2018-09-06 at 19:35 +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > > > Which one is right and why the kernel tree is polluted with C99-headers > > > when they do not pass checkpatch.pl? > > checkpatch ignores c99 headers since 2016. For headers I get these warnings: WARNING: Missing or malformed SPDX-License-Identifier tag in line 1 #243: FILE: drivers/platform/x86/intel_sgx/sgx.h:1: +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-3-Clause) /Jarkko