From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarkko Sakkinen Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 01/23] x86/sgx: Update MAINTAINERS Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2018 10:20:23 +0200 Message-ID: <20181118082023.GJ5897@linux.intel.com> References: <20181116010412.23967-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <20181116010412.23967-2-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <20181116142248.GH20313@zn.tnic> <20181116150714.GA4244@linux.intel.com> <20181116202403.GN20313@zn.tnic> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181116202403.GN20313@zn.tnic> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Borislav Petkov Cc: x86@kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, dave.hansen@intel.com, sean.j.christopherson@intel.com, nhorman@redhat.com, npmccallum@redhat.com, serge.ayoun@intel.com, shay.katz-zamir@intel.com, haitao.huang@linux.intel.com, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, kai.svahn@intel.com, mark.shanahan@intel.com, luto@amacapital.net, Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "David S. Miller" , Andrew Morton , Nicolas Ferre , Arnd Bergmann , open list List-Id: platform-driver-x86.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 09:24:03PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 05:07:14PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > Yes, I think it could be renamed as sgx.c. Should the driver part be > > also called as sgx.ko? > > I guess that's your call guys. The reason why I asked is because I like > shorter names and "sgx" is unambiguous enough. AFAICT, there's no one > else doing SGX atm. > > :-) We go with that! Thanks for the feedback. /Jarkko