From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/24] Input: pwm-vibra - Simplify with dev_err_probe() Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 20:40:50 +0200 Message-ID: <20200827184050.GB6196@kozik-lap> References: <20200826181706.11098-1-krzk@kernel.org> <20200826181706.11098-6-krzk@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Dmitry Torokhov , Hans de Goede , Linus Walleij , Bastien Nocera , Sangwon Jee , Eugen Hristev , "Gustavo A. R. Silva" , Andy Shevchenko , linux-input , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Platform Driver List-Id: platform-driver-x86.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 12:06:46PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 9:18 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > > Common pattern of handling deferred probe can be simplified with > > dev_err_probe(). Less code and also it prints the error value. > > > err = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(vibrator->vcc); > > + if (err) > > + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, err, "Failed to request regulator\n"); > > Same comment, no need to have additional PTR_ERR_OZR_ZERO(). Yes. Best regards, Krzysztof