From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51A55C63777 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 16:30:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06417206F9 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 16:30:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389861AbgKXQaK (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2020 11:30:10 -0500 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:43325 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2389808AbgKXQaK (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2020 11:30:10 -0500 IronPort-SDR: wYFhcM4InTwIy38A8EFdz9F+v0XzRp70eGEnZHYWXZjOD2hdm9ixAOhWYhOLC7mOYD1R3flwe3 /6kUcWtIm5mA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9815"; a="172130427" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.78,366,1599548400"; d="scan'208";a="172130427" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Nov 2020 08:30:09 -0800 IronPort-SDR: HK8pTT8Bw1bAULB0mxPreSk/zrGE4Z7z+29sUdK5EAmVvt9GMFnivettWPIL1CpTQ1hi9xc4QK 3V4HBbBV63Ag== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.78,366,1599548400"; d="scan'208";a="546892105" Received: from lahna.fi.intel.com (HELO lahna) ([10.237.72.163]) by orsmga005-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Nov 2020 08:30:06 -0800 Received: by lahna (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 24 Nov 2020 18:30:02 +0200 Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 18:30:02 +0200 From: Mika Westerberg To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Linus Walleij , Hans de Goede , Mark Gross , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , Platform Driver , Len Brown Subject: Re: Request for pre-review of pending MID removal patch series Message-ID: <20201124163002.GN2532@lahna.fi.intel.com> References: <20201124144300.GM2532@lahna.fi.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 05:02:13PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 4:43 PM Mika Westerberg > wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 07:59:29PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > +Cc: Mika > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 8:07 PM Andy Shevchenko > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > > > There is a pending patch series [1] to remove a lot of legacy code > > > > related to old Intel MID platforms. (Note, not all of them, since we > > > > have an ACPI based Intel Edison edition which continue working nicely > > > > after this) > > > > > > > > Most of the code is shuffling arch/x86 and the series is quite > > > > dependent on the contents of that folder (for the sake of > > > > bisectability). Since that the only way it would be integrated is > > > > through the tip tree I would like to have your preliminary review on > > > > other contents — #3 and #4 are PDx86 and GPIO subsystems. In this case > > > > I won't resend this many times. > > > > > > > > I have a preliminary offline agreement with Len Brown on SFI removal > > > > (#2 in the list). > > > > > > > > [1]: https://gitlab.com/andy-shev/next/-/commits/topic/mid-removal/ > > > > Looks pretty good to me. > > Thanks! Can I use your tag (which is better?) for some patches (which ones?)? Aren't you going to submit this series for real review at some point? I can then formally review some of the patches. > > I wonder it is possible to remove gma500 also > > or it is used in Edison? > > It can be used on other platforms based on not-going-to-be-removed > Merrifield and possibly Moorefield. > Hence I would like to leave it for now. OK.