From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4B511FDA66; Fri, 14 Mar 2025 11:56:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741953378; cv=none; b=Qe7Msyg+AI283bms2yg7rSif/jvsmxQSBdpzVQd7UJy4kyd1ebPiEW0vq7XJ9yX8mGtfvL/ZMxx3o9nYEcTuraGD2V4Yb86RdDV8h3w7wrivTDR4ZM2EGPkh+6S+YUYimd6diets7XEsL01VI3DmxlLuMimrfQO+I8jOTOOknvc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741953378; c=relaxed/simple; bh=saN+oyAs7en/yrR6Un/aRcgUQkDXElpe0GDCuKxLkJk=; h=From:Date:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=UjBw/ceSrxGC9ZYUYu0Fhe7Ll72fS32kogKYDsgQ2q5Yz0+NvlghztWnk32kjNykL9TLw02b3Sm5GnB7J0DKSSv12TAOwyyrW02SexaXWSSCNHbQjaN9B0crqNzvbbKHi0r4lbI0yY7oIOwLvgscGMVHCTlvQYALwQkjedRvjDE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=IWrmmagk; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="IWrmmagk" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1741953377; x=1773489377; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id: references:mime-version; bh=saN+oyAs7en/yrR6Un/aRcgUQkDXElpe0GDCuKxLkJk=; b=IWrmmagkse325YJEW6aezqhyCr3E5pbnDUgpoiuImcZtSNTHRk6E2RT6 xYmRARBAJEC9JatFkNDDJYGlIelMstJT1eZIYUTcPeNjNUBitE04x4AjI LtBhVQ9QSyBEUMBDh9dMxuwYdWcCvqfebgP/7Lx4kFAz1ityXvVBzPb7t uQHV1DKCHIJ8jIxzX7D6CFZZNePm5v4pvIJhbGIAQrd8NGv/emaK0zjVD DS55MlyKStR359t98hewSuRFG3oMtwPoItUkUyeRL4pKqMMgCNytaJN9k 5DY3BcpIxos+E5MT5vWLSRgJ7m+8IZdrAKneV7TvkMKQI5yg50webOzdi w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: ySmjTaK7TD+GELOXAmlBhw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: dkTG25RZS9yDUPNGWb2STA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11372"; a="65561234" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.14,246,1736841600"; d="scan'208";a="65561234" Received: from fmviesa006.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.146]) by orvoesa101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Mar 2025 04:56:11 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: NFvoujGuSVKWWoxL9f8j+w== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 9PG90Pj9RLaCqHhmrgkl5Q== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.14,246,1736841600"; d="scan'208";a="121044011" Received: from ijarvine-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.244.56]) by fmviesa006-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Mar 2025 04:56:07 -0700 From: =?UTF-8?q?Ilpo=20J=C3=A4rvinen?= Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 13:56:04 +0200 (EET) To: Andy Shevchenko cc: Choong Yong Liang , Hans de Goede , =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Ilpo_J=E4rvinen?= , David E Box , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: add option to build without ACPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <2a00773a-b887-7966-36de-0e2b93359912@linux.intel.com> References: <20250313085526.1439092-1-yong.liang.choong@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="8323328-2117771442-1741953364=:10784" This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323328-2117771442-1741953364=:10784 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On Thu, 13 Mar 2025, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 10:55=E2=80=AFAM Choong Yong Liang > wrote: > > > > From: David E. Box > > > > Introduce a configuration option that allows users to build the > > intel_pmc_ipc driver without ACPI support. This is useful for > > systems where ACPI is not available or desired. > > > > Based on the discussion from the patch [1], it was necessary to > > provide this option to accommodate specific use cases. >=20 > > Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/202502271215= 22.1802832-6-yong.liang.choong@linux.intel.com/#26280764 [1] >=20 > > >=20 > No blank line here, but I think Hans or Ilpo may tweak this when applying= =2E >=20 > Otherwise LGTM, > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko > Thanks! Hi both, The original commit went through net-next tree so I cannot take this into= =20 pdx86 tree until after the merge window. It seems low impact enough that=20 coordinating with the netdev might not be worth the effort. To get it going through net-next tree, you'd need to submit v3 so that in= =20 addition to the current receipients, all relevant netdev people & ML are=20 included as receipients. But I'd be fine if you leave it until after the=20 merge window and I can then handle it then. > > Signed-off-by: David E. Box > > Co-developed-by: Choong Yong Liang > > Signed-off-by: Choong Yong Liang --=20 i. --8323328-2117771442-1741953364=:10784--