From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SF Markus Elfring Subject: Re: Sony-laptop: Adjustments for sony_nc_setup_rfkill() Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2017 15:20:09 +0100 Message-ID: <2c1996c5-0833-dcd3-c747-62eca46a433d@users.sourceforge.net> References: <17ee534c-9fe6-19c4-0522-76cd3cbe5f88@users.sourceforge.net> <340e5426-a9ba-2193-2735-85e918773785@users.sourceforge.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.4]:56185 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750778AbdKEOUv (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Nov 2017 09:20:51 -0500 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-GB Sender: platform-driver-x86-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Andy Shevchenko , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org Cc: Darren Hart , Marco Chiappero , Matthew Garrett , Mattia Dongili , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Andy Shevchenko >> Do you find the following details useful for further clarification? >> >> text: -32 >> data: 0 >> bss: 0 > > ...but kernel is compiled with -O2 which, Did you try to compare results for my update suggestion also with the default build configuration? > I suppose, will eliminate these repeats. My build results did not fit to your expectations. > So, the main question is "WHY" you are doing this change. > > I didn't find any convinced explanation (yet?). Do you find a reduction of 32 bytes for the object code not interesting enough just by achieving such a small effect because of the replacement of three function calls “rfkill_destroy” with goto statements? Regards, Markus