From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Hansen Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] x86/cpu: Add Icelake to Intel family Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 08:40:22 -0800 Message-ID: <46ad3b08-b96b-6ef2-a5e4-fb0865865916@intel.com> References: <20190213150810.32750-1-rajneesh.bhardwaj@linux.intel.com> <20190213150810.32750-7-rajneesh.bhardwaj@linux.intel.com> <20190213152326.GA1883@zn.tnic> <308aa852-b2c3-3336-707f-d54de6ad77b7@linux.intel.com> <20190213160405.GC1883@zn.tnic> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Bhardwaj, Rajneesh" , Borislav Petkov Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, dvhart@infradead.org, andy@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , Dave Hansen , "David E. Box" , Srinivas Pandruvada List-Id: platform-driver-x86.vger.kernel.org On 2/13/19 8:35 AM, Bhardwaj, Rajneesh wrote: > I sure did, perhaps it wasn't clear in my response. I can remove > coreboot link in next version but please clarify whether i should keep > other link that i mentioned or just keep the commit without any link? I think we're hearing loud and clear from the maintainers that they prefer *public*, official documentation from Intel to back up our patches. Barring that, they'd rather have no link than a link to some other random project.