X86 platform drivers
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gabriele Mazzotta <gabriele.mzt@gmail.com>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: System automatically wakes up because of Intel Rapid Start Technology
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 19:57:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6760597.z8zpCLmhLz@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2403684.tbaxlpZUxO@xps13>

On Monday 22 December 2014 19:41:52 Gabriele Mazzotta wrote:
> On Monday 22 December 2014 18:02:54 Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > Getting this right is a little bit annoying - if the timer would have 
> > expired during the time we were suspended, we don't want to re-enable 
> > it. I *think* this covers all cases, and does it in generic code rather 
> > than special-casing it. Any chance you can give it a test?
> 
> I've done a quick test. has_persistent_clock() is false on my system,
> so this patch has no effect as it is.

I did another quick test and moved the code so that it is executed
before has_persistent_clock() is checked. Everything seems to be
working as intended. I tried to suspend and resume multiple times
within one minute and exactly one minute after the last suspension
the system transitioned from S3 to S4.

I haven't checked properly whether it is OK or not to simply move
the code or not, but I wanted to let you know that it works.

> > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/class.c b/drivers/rtc/class.c
> > index 472a5ad..4e3a2a1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/rtc/class.c
> > +++ b/drivers/rtc/class.c
> > @@ -91,6 +91,8 @@ static int rtc_suspend(struct device *dev)
> >  		old_system = timespec64_sub(old_system, delta_delta);
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	rtc->valid_alarm = !rtc_read_alarm(rtc, &rtc->alarm);
> > +
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -145,6 +147,29 @@ static int rtc_resume(struct device *dev)
> >  	if (sleep_time.tv_sec >= 0)
> >  		timekeeping_inject_sleeptime64(&sleep_time);
> >  	rtc_hctosys_ret = 0;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * If there was an alarm set before suspend, make sure that the
> > +	 * platform hasn't overwritten it
> > +	 */
> > +	if (rtc->valid_alarm) {
> > +		struct rtc_time tm;
> > +		long now, scheduled;
> > +
> > +		rtc_read_time(rtc, &tm);
> > +		rtc_tm_to_time(&rtc->alarm.time, &scheduled);
> > +		rtc_tm_to_time(&tm, &now);
> > +
> > +		/* Clear the alarm if it went off during suspend */
> > +		if (scheduled <= now) {
> > +			rtc_time_to_tm(0, &rtc->alarm.time);
> > +			rtc->alarm.enabled = 0;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		if (rtc->ops && rtc->ops->set_alarm)
> > +			rtc->ops->set_alarm(rtc->dev.parent, &rtc->alarm);
> > +	}
> > +
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > diff --git a/include/linux/rtc.h b/include/linux/rtc.h
> > index 6d6be09..bc805ff 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/rtc.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/rtc.h
> > @@ -133,6 +133,10 @@ struct rtc_device
> >  	/* Some hardware can't support UIE mode */
> >  	int uie_unsupported;
> >  
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> > +	struct rtc_wkalrm alarm;
> > +	bool valid_alarm;
> > +#endif
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_RTC_INTF_DEV_UIE_EMUL
> >  	struct work_struct uie_task;
> >  	struct timer_list uie_timer;
> > 
> > 
> > 

  reply	other threads:[~2014-12-22 18:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-22 13:59 System automatically wakes up because of Intel Rapid Start Technology Gabriele Mazzotta
2014-12-22 14:44 ` Matthew Garrett
2014-12-22 14:48 ` Matthew Garrett
2014-12-22 14:59 ` Matthew Garrett
2014-12-22 15:50   ` Gabriele Mazzotta
2014-12-22 16:10     ` Gabriele Mazzotta
2014-12-22 16:13       ` Matthew Garrett
2014-12-22 18:02       ` Matthew Garrett
2014-12-22 18:41         ` Gabriele Mazzotta
2014-12-22 18:57           ` Gabriele Mazzotta [this message]
2014-12-22 16:12     ` Matthew Garrett

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6760597.z8zpCLmhLz@xps13 \
    --to=gabriele.mzt@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox