X86 platform drivers
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] platform/x86: Fix header inclusion in linux/platform_data/x86/soc.h
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 17:15:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7d1749ec-bd8a-1fb4-49c1-0bb680ad530f@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230206145238.19460-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>

Hi,

On 2/6/23 15:52, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> First of all, we don't use intel-family.h directly. On the other hand
> we actively use boolean type, that is defined in the types.h (we take
> top-level header for that) and x86_cpu_id, that is provided in the
> mod_devicetable.h.
> 
> Secondly, we don't need to spread SOC_INTEL_IS_CPU() macro to the users.
> Hence, undefine it when it's appropriate.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>

Thank you for your patch, I've applied this patch to my review-hans 
branch:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-drivers-x86.git/log/?h=review-hans

Note it will show up in my review-hans branch once I've pushed my
local branch there, which might take a while.

Once I've run some tests on this branch the patches there will be
added to the platform-drivers-x86/for-next branch and eventually
will be included in the pdx86 pull-request to Linus for the next
merge-window.

Regards,

Hans

> ---
>  include/linux/platform_data/x86/soc.h | 7 ++++++-
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/x86/soc.h b/include/linux/platform_data/x86/soc.h
> index da05f425587a..a5705189e2ac 100644
> --- a/include/linux/platform_data/x86/soc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/platform_data/x86/soc.h
> @@ -8,10 +8,13 @@
>  #ifndef __PLATFORM_DATA_X86_SOC_H
>  #define __PLATFORM_DATA_X86_SOC_H
>  
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86)
>  
> +#include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
> +
>  #include <asm/cpu_device_id.h>
> -#include <asm/intel-family.h>
>  
>  #define SOC_INTEL_IS_CPU(soc, type)				\
>  static inline bool soc_intel_is_##soc(void)			\
> @@ -34,6 +37,8 @@ SOC_INTEL_IS_CPU(apl, ATOM_GOLDMONT);
>  SOC_INTEL_IS_CPU(glk, ATOM_GOLDMONT_PLUS);
>  SOC_INTEL_IS_CPU(cml, KABYLAKE_L);
>  
> +#undef SOC_INTEL_IS_CPU
> +
>  #else /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86) */
>  
>  static inline bool soc_intel_is_byt(void)


      reply	other threads:[~2023-02-10 16:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-06 14:52 [PATCH v1 1/1] platform/x86: Fix header inclusion in linux/platform_data/x86/soc.h Andy Shevchenko
2023-02-10 16:15 ` Hans de Goede [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7d1749ec-bd8a-1fb4-49c1-0bb680ad530f@redhat.com \
    --to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox