From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>, markgross@kernel.org
Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, Patil.Reddy@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND 02/11] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add support for PMF APCI layer
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2022 15:18:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83e3c4d6-79c4-2ceb-c366-8f03b4be886f@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ca75e2b7-e18d-4610-af16-b4ef8fb9f95d@redhat.com>
Hi,
On 8/1/22 14:48, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 7/28/22 20:20, Shyam Sundar S K wrote:
>> PMF driver implements the ACPI methods as defined by AMD for PMF Support.
>> The ACPI layer acts as a glue that helps in providing the infrastructure
>> for OEMs customization.
>>
>> OEMs can refer to PMF support documentation to decide on the list of
>> functions to be supported on their specific platform model.
>>
>> AMD mandates that PMF ACPI fn0 and fn1 to be implemented which
>> provides the set of functions, params and the notifications that
>> would be sent to PMF driver so that PMF driver can adapt and
>> react.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile | 2 +-
>> drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/acpi.c | 182 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c | 1 +
>> drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h | 32 +++++
>> 4 files changed, 216 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/acpi.c
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile
>> index 459005f659e5..2617eba773ce 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile
>> @@ -5,4 +5,4 @@
>> #
>>
>> obj-$(CONFIG_AMD_PMF) += amd-pmf.o
>> -amd-pmf-objs := core.o
>> +amd-pmf-objs := core.o acpi.o
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/acpi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/acpi.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..bd796d7e1d96
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/acpi.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,182 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +/*
>> + * AMD Platform Management Framework Driver
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (c) 2022, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
>> + * All Rights Reserved.
>> + *
>> + * Author: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
>> +#include "pmf.h"
>> +
>> +#define APMF_METHOD "\\_SB_.PMF_.APMF"
>> +
>> +static unsigned long supported_func;
>> +
>> +static void apmf_if_parse_functions(struct apmf_if_functions *func, u32 mask);
>> +
>> +static union acpi_object *apmf_if_call(struct apmf_if *apmf_if, int func, struct acpi_buffer *param)
>> +{
>> + struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
>> + struct acpi_object_list apmf_if_arg_list;
>> + union acpi_object apmf_if_args[2];
>> + acpi_status status;
>> +
>> + apmf_if_arg_list.count = 2;
>> + apmf_if_arg_list.pointer = &apmf_if_args[0];
>> +
>> + apmf_if_args[0].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
>> + apmf_if_args[0].integer.value = func;
>> +
>> + if (param) {
>> + apmf_if_args[1].type = ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER;
>> + apmf_if_args[1].buffer.length = param->length;
>> + apmf_if_args[1].buffer.pointer = param->pointer;
>> + } else {
>> + apmf_if_args[1].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
>> + apmf_if_args[1].integer.value = 0;
>> + }
>> +
>> + status = acpi_evaluate_object(apmf_if->handle, NULL, &apmf_if_arg_list, &buffer);
>> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
>> + pr_err("PMF: APMF method call failed\n");
Since the plan is to drop struct apmf_if and to directly store the
handle in amd_pmf_dev we will now have an amd_pmf_dev here so
please use dev_err() instead of pr_err() here.
>> + if (status != AE_NOT_FOUND)
>> + kfree(buffer.pointer);
>> +
>> + return NULL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return buffer.pointer;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int apmf_if_call_store_buffer(struct apmf_if *apmf_if, int func, void *dest, size_t out_sz)
>> +{
>> + union acpi_object *info;
>> + size_t size;
>> + int err = 0;
>> +
>> + info = apmf_if_call(apmf_if, func, NULL);
>> + if (!info)
>> + return -EIO;
>> +
>> + if (info->type != ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER) {
>> + pr_err("object is not a buffer\n");
Since the plan is to drop struct apmf_if and to directly store the
handle in amd_pmf_dev we will now have an amd_pmf_dev here so
please use dev_err() instead of pr_err() here.
This also means that adding the:
#define pr_fmt(fmt) "AMD-PMF: " fmt
line will no longer be necessary.
>> + err = -EINVAL;
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (info->buffer.length < 2) {
>> + pr_err("buffer too small\n");
>> + err = -EINVAL;
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> + size = *(u16 *)info->buffer.pointer;
>> + if (info->buffer.length < size) {
>> + pr_err("buffer smaller then headersize %u < %zu\n",
>> + info->buffer.length, size);
>> + err = -EINVAL;
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (size < out_sz) {
>> + pr_err("buffer too small %zu\n", size);
>> + err = -EINVAL;
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> + size = out_sz;
>> + memcpy(dest, info->buffer.pointer, size);
>> +
>> +out:
>> + kfree(info);
>> + return err;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void apmf_if_parse_functions(struct apmf_if_functions *func, u32 mask)
>> +{
>> + func->system_params = mask & APMF_FUNC_GET_SYS_PARAMS;
>
> I just noticed that this is not correct, this should be:
>
> func->system_params = mask & BIT(APMF_FUNC_GET_SYS_PARAMS - 1);
>
> Which for APMF_FUNC_GET_SYS_PARAMS happens to be the same, but for
> other AMPF_FUNC_* values the difference does matter!
>
> Also this information is duplicated by:
>
> is_apmf_func_supported(APMF_FUNC_GET_SYS_PARAMS) please drop the
> apmf_if_functions struct and use is_apmf_func_supported() everywhere.
>
> Note this means that you also will need to drop func->sbios_heartbeat
> which does not come from the mask and which is initialized in
> a different place rather then inside apmf_if_parse_functions() which
> already shows that sbios_hearbeat does not really belong inside
> this struct.
>
> Instead of moving the sbios_heartbeat flag, please just directly
> use notify_cfg.hb_interval inside apmf_acpi_deinit(). This will also
> make the cancel_delayed_work_sync(&pmf_dev->heart_beat) condition
> match the queue condition 1:1.
>
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +int is_apmf_func_supported(unsigned long index)
>> +{
>> + /* If bit-n is set, that indicates function n+1 is supported */
>> + return ((supported_func & (1 << (index - 1))) != 0);
>
> Please write this as:
>
> return (supported_func & BIT(index - 1)) != 0;
>
> or as:
>
> return !!(supported_func & BIT(index - 1));
>
>
Also please make this function take a "struct amd_pmf_dev *pdev" argument
and add an "u32 supported_func" to amd_pmf_dev instead of making it a global
variable.
Regards,
Hans
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int apmf_if_verify_interface(struct amd_pmf_dev *pdev, struct apmf_if *apmf_if)
>> +{
>> + struct apmf_verify_interface output;
>> + int err;
>> +
>> + err = apmf_if_call_store_buffer(apmf_if, APMF_FUNC_VERIFY_INTERFACE,
>> + &output, sizeof(output));
>> + if (err)
>> + return err;
>> +
>> + apmf_if_parse_functions(&apmf_if->func, output.supported_functions);
>> + supported_func = output.supported_functions;
>> + dev_dbg(pdev->dev, "supported functions:0x%x notifications:0x%x\n",
>> + output.supported_functions, output.notification_mask);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int apmf_get_system_params(struct apmf_if *apmf_if)
>> +{
>> + struct apmf_system_params params;
>> + int err;
>> +
>> + if (apmf_if->func.system_params) {
>> + err = apmf_if_call_store_buffer(apmf_if, APMF_FUNC_GET_SYS_PARAMS,
>> + ¶ms, sizeof(params));
>> + if (err)
>> + return err;
>> + }
>> +
>> + pr_debug("PMF: system params mask:0x%x flags:0x%x cmd_code:0x%x\n",
>> + params.valid_mask,
>> + params.flags,
>> + params.command_code);
>> + params.flags = params.flags & params.valid_mask;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int apmf_acpi_init(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf_dev)
>> +{
>> + acpi_handle apmf_if_handle;
>> + struct apmf_if *apmf_if;
>> + acpi_status status;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + status = acpi_get_handle(NULL, (acpi_string) APMF_METHOD, &apmf_if_handle);
>> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> + apmf_if = kzalloc(sizeof(*apmf_if), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!apmf_if)
>> + goto out;
>> +
>> + apmf_if->handle = apmf_if_handle;
>> +
>> + ret = apmf_if_verify_interface(pmf_dev, apmf_if);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(pmf_dev->dev, "APMF verify interface failed :%d\n", ret);
>> + kfree(apmf_if);
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> + pmf_dev->apmf_if = apmf_if;
>
> After dropping the apmf_if_functions sub-struct from amp_if amp_if only contains
> an acpi_handle. Please just store the handle (and later on also the struct
> apmf_notification_cfg) directly inside struct amd_pmf_dev, this also removes
> the need for doing the whole alloc + free + associated error handling dance here.
>
> Regsards,
>
> Hans
>
>
>> +
>> + ret = apmf_get_system_params(apmf_if);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(pmf_dev->dev, "APMF apmf_get_system_params failed :%d\n", ret);
>> + kfree(apmf_if);
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> +out:
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
>> index aef97965c181..c5002b7bb904 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
>> @@ -204,6 +204,7 @@ static int amd_pmf_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> if (!dev->regbase)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> + apmf_acpi_init(dev);
>> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, dev);
>>
>> mutex_init(&dev->lock);
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
>> index 1c2e942e5096..08c6bc0e2b42 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
>> @@ -11,6 +11,12 @@
>> #ifndef PMF_H
>> #define PMF_H
>>
>> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
>> +
>> +/* APMF Functions */
>> +#define APMF_FUNC_VERIFY_INTERFACE 0
>> +#define APMF_FUNC_GET_SYS_PARAMS 1
>> +
>> /* Message Definitions */
>> #define SET_SPL 0x03 /* SPL: Sustained Power Limit */
>> #define SET_SPPT 0x05 /* SPPT: Slow Package Power Tracking */
>> @@ -30,6 +36,30 @@
>> #define GET_STT_LIMIT_APU 0x20
>> #define GET_STT_LIMIT_HS2 0x21
>>
>> +/* AMD PMF BIOS interfaces */
>> +struct apmf_if_functions {
>> + bool system_params;
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct apmf_if {
>> + acpi_handle handle;
>> + struct apmf_if_functions func;
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct apmf_verify_interface {
>> + u16 size;
>> + u16 version;
>> + u32 notification_mask;
>> + u32 supported_functions;
>> +} __packed;
>> +
>> +struct apmf_system_params {
>> + u16 size;
>> + u32 valid_mask;
>> + u32 flags;
>> + u8 command_code;
>> +} __packed;
>> +
>> struct amd_pmf_dev {
>> void __iomem *regbase;
>> void __iomem *smu_virt_addr;
>> @@ -37,10 +67,12 @@ struct amd_pmf_dev {
>> u32 base_addr;
>> u32 cpu_id;
>> struct device *dev;
>> + struct apmf_if *apmf_if;
>> struct mutex lock; /* protects the PMF interface */
>> };
>>
>> /* Core Layer */
>> +int apmf_acpi_init(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf_dev);
>> int amd_pmf_send_cmd(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, u8 message, bool get, u32 arg, u32 *data);
>>
>> #endif /* PMF_H */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-01 13:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-28 18:20 [PATCH v2 RESEND 00/11] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Introduce AMD PMF Driver Shyam Sundar S K
2022-07-28 18:20 ` [PATCH v2 RESEND 01/11] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add support for PMF core layer Shyam Sundar S K
2022-08-01 11:16 ` Hans de Goede
2022-07-28 18:20 ` [PATCH v2 RESEND 02/11] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add support for PMF APCI layer Shyam Sundar S K
2022-08-01 11:24 ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-01 12:48 ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-01 13:18 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2022-07-28 18:20 ` [PATCH v2 RESEND 03/11] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add support SPS PMF feature Shyam Sundar S K
2022-08-01 11:30 ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-01 12:50 ` Hans de Goede
2022-07-28 18:20 ` [PATCH v2 RESEND 04/11] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add debugfs information Shyam Sundar S K
2022-08-01 11:35 ` Hans de Goede
2022-07-28 18:20 ` [PATCH v2 RESEND 05/11] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add heartbeat signal support Shyam Sundar S K
2022-08-01 11:38 ` Hans de Goede
2022-07-28 18:20 ` [PATCH v2 RESEND 06/11] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add fan control support Shyam Sundar S K
2022-08-01 11:40 ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-01 12:51 ` Hans de Goede
2022-07-28 18:20 ` [PATCH v2 RESEND 07/11] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Get performance metrics from PMFW Shyam Sundar S K
2022-07-28 21:02 ` Limonciello, Mario
2022-07-29 17:43 ` Shyam Sundar S K
2022-08-01 11:50 ` Hans de Goede
2022-07-28 18:20 ` [PATCH v2 RESEND 08/11] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add support for Auto mode feature Shyam Sundar S K
2022-08-01 12:55 ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-01 13:20 ` Hans de Goede
2022-07-28 18:20 ` [PATCH v2 RESEND 09/11] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Handle AMT and CQL events for Auto mode Shyam Sundar S K
2022-08-01 13:55 ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-02 11:22 ` Shyam Sundar S K
2022-08-02 12:20 ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-01 14:01 ` Hans de Goede
2022-07-28 18:20 ` [PATCH v2 RESEND 10/11] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Force load driver on older supported platforms Shyam Sundar S K
2022-08-01 13:58 ` Hans de Goede
2022-07-28 18:20 ` [PATCH v2 RESEND 11/11] MAINTAINERS: Add AMD PMF driver entry Shyam Sundar S K
2022-08-01 13:58 ` Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83e3c4d6-79c4-2ceb-c366-8f03b4be886f@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=Patil.Reddy@amd.com \
--cc=Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com \
--cc=markgross@kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox