From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B8rn_Mork?= Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: add adaptive_kbd_modes parameter Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2018 11:21:14 +0100 Message-ID: <87in0l31b9.fsf@miraculix.mork.no> References: <20181115073429.z44czywrf7f65ndb@dcvr> <20181124232327.t3awc6dnjqdtvzwu@dcvr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20181124232327.t3awc6dnjqdtvzwu@dcvr> (Eric Wong's message of "Sat, 24 Nov 2018 23:23:27 +0000") Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Eric Wong Cc: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh , Shuduo Sang , Darren Hart , Andy Shevchenko , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org List-Id: platform-driver-x86.vger.kernel.org Eric Wong writes: > Eric Wong wrote: >> The above setting with this change and the following keymap >> preserves my sanity on the atrocious adaptive keyboard on >> the 2nd-gen X1 Carbon: > > Any comments on this patch? The Esc and F-keys on the keyboard > are still numb and I'll be getting rid of the laptop in a few > days; but maybe my patch can still be useful to others... I've read through and I like it, FWIW. A brilliant idea. I don't have the hardare to test the patch, though.... But I do wonder if you aren't missing an empty mask protection somewhere? If I read this right, then there is nothing preventing you from writing 0 here: > +static ssize_t adaptive_kbd_modes_store(struct device *dev, > + struct device_attribute *attr, > + const char *buf, size_t count) > +{ > + unsigned long t; > + > + if (parse_strtoul(buf, (1 << LAYFLAT_MODE) - 1, &t)) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + adaptive_kbd_modes =3D (unsigned int)t; > + return count; > +} And then I believe you have a busy loop here: > @@ -3815,20 +3838,20 @@ static int adaptive_keyboard_set_mode(int new_mod= e) >=20=20 > static int adaptive_keyboard_get_next_mode(int mode) > { > - size_t i; > - size_t max_mode =3D ARRAY_SIZE(adaptive_keyboard_modes) - 1; > - > - for (i =3D 0; i <=3D max_mode; i++) { > - if (adaptive_keyboard_modes[i] =3D=3D mode) > - break; > - } > + int max_mode =3D fls(adaptive_kbd_modes); > + int new_mode =3D mode >=3D max_mode ? HOME_MODE : mode + 1; >=20=20 > - if (i >=3D max_mode) > - i =3D 0; > - else > - i++; > + /* make sure the new mode is allowed by the user */ > + while (!(adaptive_kbd_modes & (1 << new_mode))) { > + new_mode++; > + if (new_mode > max_mode) > + new_mode =3D HOME_MODE; >=20=20 > - return adaptive_keyboard_modes[i]; > + /* maybe the user disabled all other modes: */ > + if (new_mode =3D=3D mode) > + return mode; > + } > + return new_mode; > } Or am I reading this wrong? Bj=C3=B8rn