From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC2FBC433E6 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 10:29:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8796225AC for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 10:29:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728168AbhAEK3p (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jan 2021 05:29:45 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:22652 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728439AbhAEK3o (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jan 2021 05:29:44 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1609842497; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=M/PzuT8W4Gk8kdtnutOjrj+8T9fhgOEqAyz4kqoY0wI=; b=VHBd5fPMzqUv6SoTMBiEnRlJKpPyeG0FshTZa5jhKYZTdzKeblyQnxY76nsFZV03ewGCM3 GIkCAHJTnm17uqqv2ZFf/kqiU1q5+RKi5sztZVWXRe21KOYhbnzytMbCkdP3aEGOyBnmdG 1ztJrA0P3/eJyK8i2Kj4gl2wpJc2GWE= Received: from mail-ej1-f71.google.com (mail-ej1-f71.google.com [209.85.218.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-575-U5quMhiuMneXWg6SIFuiIQ-1; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 05:28:15 -0500 X-MC-Unique: U5quMhiuMneXWg6SIFuiIQ-1 Received: by mail-ej1-f71.google.com with SMTP id g24so7877654ejh.22 for ; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 02:28:15 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=M/PzuT8W4Gk8kdtnutOjrj+8T9fhgOEqAyz4kqoY0wI=; b=n2rUWiUy+9zwe2yIGzWAwvZ3YM/DQnFRX8CQaqjjPepFxBjnkZug+7TwFqzt1zkvxe CBA57eBkrfEXfi99V6dJapxSQYI8D2b3r5nDCmjviBUpuc9wrEDBo8v8lndmbeBmK2kd OhulO2czhmBRKlI9yNdQ94DrwYmQji1trN16d95eEC8B25Wj+YxNE/VBAzTjuOhv6lui betXd3a0gtIMsl0DOWiL6kP+J0xYxJcOAW5JaZ0lDzIBugxoA4NhpsMv8VLURqpyOMgC ba71CC6frQn/ezR2PgtGK2nrvxO6nSBH967ptepoZdI4icwAPyp0G5Tr+BPbYzu+YGk4 FmyA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530mi+XFyZ3N16TCjypJMOJCWaUdNyW7HeNC+BV+CZItwNz6RGiT Ze60YOECKCVytXCScwBo1pAM+wdmRU6qSKa5V92uwhtWQisCjY0rbeMXlbOyAZWqepMlXA6Gzbc KPjL3ctqR8s22MJQR5Lfq875HvqtjRZ0JtA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:31cb:: with SMTP id f11mr31663030ejf.468.1609842494754; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 02:28:14 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzVNx6QjYBlgEGbmPJZsFpcosRCwFj+dwg907DxGdL3NBnpYjCbNSdlKJycPZRmURvchwRyow== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:31cb:: with SMTP id f11mr31663019ejf.468.1609842494583; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 02:28:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from x1.localdomain (2001-1c00-0c1e-bf00-37a3-353b-be90-1238.cable.dynamic.v6.ziggo.nl. [2001:1c00:c1e:bf00:37a3:353b:be90:1238]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id rk12sm24514865ejb.75.2021.01.05.02.28.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 05 Jan 2021 02:28:13 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH 0/2] IdeaPad platform profile support To: Mark Pearson , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Jiaxun Yang , Platform Driver , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , Mark Gross , Ike Panhc , ACPI Devel Maling List , Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <20210101125629.20974-1-jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com> <35ac853a-266c-6944-6e5e-6286456865e3@redhat.com> <6a29f338-d9e4-150c-81dd-2ffb54f5bc35@redhat.com> <2eefa5ec-4f09-eabd-2c20-f217fa084dfc@lenovo.com> From: Hans de Goede Message-ID: <8fd4abbd-41d4-9980-c7e5-e0f299bb96cf@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2021 11:28:13 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2eefa5ec-4f09-eabd-2c20-f217fa084dfc@lenovo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 1/4/21 10:58 PM, Mark Pearson wrote: > On 04/01/2021 15:58, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 1/4/21 9:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 3:36 PM Hans de Goede >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On 1/1/21 1:56 PM, Jiaxun Yang wrote: >>>>> Tested on Lenovo Yoga-14SARE Chinese Edition. >>>>> > >> >>> Also, on a somewhat related note, I'm afraid that it may not be a >>> good idea to push this series for 5.11-rc in the face of recent >>> objections against new material going in after the merge window. >> >> That is fine with me, since this did not make rc1 (nor rc2) I'm not >> entirely comfortable with sending out a late pull-req for the pdx86 >> side of this either, so lets postpone this to 5.12 (sorry Mark). > It is what it is. > >> >> Rafael, once we have the discussion with the passing a pointer back >> to the drivers data thing resolved (and a patch merged for that if we >> go that route) can you provide me with an immutable branch to merge >> into pdx86/for-next so that I can then merge the pdx86 bits on top ? >> >> Note this does not need to be done right now around say rc4 would be >> fine, so that we have some time for the patches currently in >> bleeding-edge to settle a bit. >> > Just for my understanding of what happens next....please correct me if I > have anything wrong: > > - platform_profile gets pulled from ACPI for 5.11 > > - platform_profile gets updated to add this data/pointer implementation > and goes into 5.12. Jiaxun, let me know if you're happy with following > up on that based on Hans suggestions, If you are pushed for time let me > know and I'll happily help out/implement/test as required. I sadly don't > have any ideapads but very happy to support your efforts any way I can. > > - Can we get the x86 portion done at the same time or does that end up > going to 5.13? No, the plan is to get it all in 5.12. This is why I asked Rafael for an immutable branch with the ACPI bits, then I can merge that branch into pdx86/for-next and then apply the thinkpad and ideapad patches on top, all for 5.12 . Regards, Hans