From: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>, ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com
Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, Patil.Reddy@amd.com,
mario.limonciello@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] platform/x86/amd/pmf: remove smart_pc_status enum
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 09:50:34 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <98a07fba-e248-4a54-bacb-76944319f875@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6d9cc65a-1eed-4fe7-b875-dac9e6bfdacc@redhat.com>
Hi Hans,
On 2/18/2024 15:54, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi Shyam,
>
> On 2/16/24 07:41, Shyam Sundar S K wrote:
>> Improve code readability by removing smart_pc_status enum, as the same
>> can be done with a simple true/false check; Update the code checks
>> accordingly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
>> ---
>> v2->v3:
>> - handle missing case for amd_pmf_init_smart_pc() after removing enum
>>
>> v1->v2:
>> - remove enum smart_pc_status and adjust the code handling
>>
>> drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c | 11 ++++++++---
>> drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h | 5 -----
>> drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c | 4 ++--
>> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
>> index feaa09f5b35a..1d6dbd246d65 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
>> @@ -330,9 +330,14 @@ static void amd_pmf_init_features(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
>> dev_dbg(dev->dev, "SPS enabled and Platform Profiles registered\n");
>> }
>>
>> - if (!amd_pmf_init_smart_pc(dev)) {
>> + amd_pmf_init_smart_pc(dev);
>> + if (dev->smart_pc_enabled) {
>> dev_dbg(dev->dev, "Smart PC Solution Enabled\n");
>> - } else if (is_apmf_func_supported(dev, APMF_FUNC_AUTO_MODE)) {
>> + /* If Smart PC is enabled, no need to check for other features */
>> + return;
>
> This return here is new behavior and a minimum should have been
> mentioned in the commit message.
>
> I plan to prepare a set of fixes to send to Linus tomorrow,
> so I will take this as is. I'll amend the commit message myself.
>
> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>
> But next time, even for a one liner like adding this commit split
> it out in a separate patch. Especially when it is causing significantly
> different behavior of the driver as is the case here.
Sorry. I thought I amended the commit message, but seems like its not.
I will take care of this in the future.
Thanks,
Shyam
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (is_apmf_func_supported(dev, APMF_FUNC_AUTO_MODE)) {
>> amd_pmf_init_auto_mode(dev);
>> dev_dbg(dev->dev, "Auto Mode Init done\n");
>> } else if (is_apmf_func_supported(dev, APMF_FUNC_DYN_SLIDER_AC) ||
>> @@ -351,7 +356,7 @@ static void amd_pmf_deinit_features(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
>> amd_pmf_deinit_sps(dev);
>> }
>>
>> - if (!dev->smart_pc_enabled) {
>> + if (dev->smart_pc_enabled) {
>> amd_pmf_deinit_smart_pc(dev);
>> } else if (is_apmf_func_supported(dev, APMF_FUNC_AUTO_MODE)) {
>> amd_pmf_deinit_auto_mode(dev);
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
>> index 16999c5b334f..66cae1cca73c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
>> @@ -441,11 +441,6 @@ struct apmf_dyn_slider_output {
>> struct apmf_cnqf_power_set ps[APMF_CNQF_MAX];
>> } __packed;
>>
>> -enum smart_pc_status {
>> - PMF_SMART_PC_ENABLED,
>> - PMF_SMART_PC_DISABLED,
>> -};
>> -
>> /* Smart PC - TA internals */
>> enum system_state {
>> SYSTEM_STATE_S0i3,
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
>> index f8c0177afb0d..8b7e3f87702e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
>> @@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ static int amd_pmf_start_policy_engine(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
>> res = amd_pmf_invoke_cmd_init(dev);
>> if (res == TA_PMF_TYPE_SUCCESS) {
>> /* Now its safe to announce that smart pc is enabled */
>> - dev->smart_pc_enabled = PMF_SMART_PC_ENABLED;
>> + dev->smart_pc_enabled = true;
>> /*
>> * Start collecting the data from TA FW after a small delay
>> * or else, we might end up getting stale values.
>> @@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ static int amd_pmf_start_policy_engine(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
>> schedule_delayed_work(&dev->pb_work, msecs_to_jiffies(pb_actions_ms * 3));
>> } else {
>> dev_err(dev->dev, "ta invoke cmd init failed err: %x\n", res);
>> - dev->smart_pc_enabled = PMF_SMART_PC_DISABLED;
>> + dev->smart_pc_enabled = false;
>> return res;
>> }
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-19 4:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-16 6:41 [PATCH v3 1/2] platform/x86/amd/pmf: remove smart_pc_status enum Shyam Sundar S K
2024-02-16 6:41 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Fix TEE enact command failure after suspend and resume Shyam Sundar S K
2024-02-16 14:26 ` Mario Limonciello
2024-02-18 10:25 ` Hans de Goede
2024-02-16 14:26 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] platform/x86/amd/pmf: remove smart_pc_status enum Mario Limonciello
2024-02-18 10:24 ` Hans de Goede
2024-02-19 4:20 ` Shyam Sundar S K [this message]
2024-02-19 12:30 ` Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=98a07fba-e248-4a54-bacb-76944319f875@amd.com \
--to=shyam-sundar.s-k@amd.com \
--cc=Patil.Reddy@amd.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox