From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAF2E537FF for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 08:59:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706518760; cv=none; b=lA9bWT431490qlsivn+smyiw6gGdCSa3/DuSVZl1rd3gajulrZMDl1K/uSAkHesWNkSzbGi3ETL32n5VuHHyh5fYD/gNhB4xtoXqL55Rtif48T+LTh2v0yc0sRriX/Jd645bxJ2oEMxMcdmzUrVZXD5sIko4ub7jrdLVWXJ7dsQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706518760; c=relaxed/simple; bh=SjgxZgEJ0zE2xG68u2eXZKUCpalABl62X6Kdteb45Og=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=cvPyr6HX665VCPUI2Fd7B4G+zKHHD5jSjDxa9jFp5GMN/l9j72b7XekxoLn2kesPaYQBfxQkzd8zJpBA4rK3tDbDY5yItuZB91j7N41Xj6tb7yzDbJ23UOvxGzeo75paHAl477NjrBziJpdPdLF9GC5MxYlP/oZPgSNJdnE5Gto= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=CatMXJ9d; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="CatMXJ9d" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1706518757; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=mz0NTo7T3zvbZQvTXWnrEg5YVgGabir9bR7S1JM1MOk=; b=CatMXJ9dkl5cWEJMzT1lh9Bu1vWmlD2yOe6nVdZ0y12+m+v5HffH0pWo3p5gOHGOcoVqxn beli+h68IirFIO+t7lcQc2K3MOf1fjMtTYa9luo27oLF2XgdHyNj2OmhkBRPfSs56dOoC5 YOqaPijvw9eFGP4RWG1knmXHwRPwFic= Received: from mail-ej1-f72.google.com (mail-ej1-f72.google.com [209.85.218.72]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-385-IPfanymOP-aMDbosm6KrPA-1; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 03:59:15 -0500 X-MC-Unique: IPfanymOP-aMDbosm6KrPA-1 Received: by mail-ej1-f72.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a35860bff34so83922566b.0 for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 00:59:15 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1706518754; x=1707123554; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=mz0NTo7T3zvbZQvTXWnrEg5YVgGabir9bR7S1JM1MOk=; b=kk1TTwVQMVBzy5wCqWesmrtmWFjJqelmIHueyEG8BfEJlALGTkPNKlNBscO0uG0eNV lGAXpci0nRAoAM2Exa/VZxS8hMD8AU/h0IZDojoePLAXOMzcF7lzl7Yn+dPGahCkcnPl 1hphhZwjIUvY/6z3SH71ZHLVdhCygq9FLSs9dE271qSVAmdjC4zu3E9pm1o4bnZcaKI+ 4icAZ8qv1QMzlPlsyMqFfPzpFgrrF5cetyt4nip+UvG91mf7G1LBtBnCVu24YvrcU7Zd RiuGJCqmg9u5n5pp0kzk+zKD+goGuBEgt1ROBQQsGyWm26ZFxdSyKllqDmiWkOWCXOE7 KyPQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxmEQRWsVthxbCiUsDutyDPBIi3yxWnGSCHztthtfp8L3DDfx9C dhIDNZhGEhUmgLMcm4nq0WaY1BETI6lEpSNHk+NwUv4nxX6QkbWsOP4r3xM+E5hX3xdSVYhO1g/ iqXsO8fEpbeRI2yMKbqqFLi5fxYFYTiekizOeFSnlGK40dV55S2HU5Lxe15sA4sy0QaZPM3s= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:a219:b0:a35:6601:e401 with SMTP id r25-20020a170906a21900b00a356601e401mr2937545ejy.5.1706518754370; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 00:59:14 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHf/JYvN1cOiBBS6nmvk4erwpIf/mxbTQA/LtkKLl9FgSRVphAi5XD9/o+bV8doYWxYglG3RA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:a219:b0:a35:6601:e401 with SMTP id r25-20020a170906a21900b00a356601e401mr2937532ejy.5.1706518754117; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 00:59:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2001:1c00:c32:7800:5bfa:a036:83f0:f9ec? (2001-1c00-0c32-7800-5bfa-a036-83f0-f9ec.cable.dynamic.v6.ziggo.nl. [2001:1c00:c32:7800:5bfa:a036:83f0:f9ec]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ub14-20020a170907c80e00b00a3109a492d4sm3647222ejc.20.2024.01.29.00.59.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 29 Jan 2024 00:59:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 09:59:11 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [v2] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Fix memory leak in amd_pmf_get_pb_data() Content-Language: en-US, nl To: Markus Elfring , Cong Liu , Shyam Sundar S K , Mario Limonciello , =?UTF-8?Q?Ilpo_J=C3=A4rvinen?= , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Cc: LKML References: <901291c8-ca9c-47b2-8321-256b314690da@redhat.com> <2b3b4754-4c20-48ef-9844-f5db6a7f527e@web.de> From: Hans de Goede In-Reply-To: <2b3b4754-4c20-48ef-9844-f5db6a7f527e@web.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, On 1/28/24 11:45, Markus Elfring wrote: >> Thank you for your patch/series, I've applied this patch >> (series) to my review-hans branch: >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-drivers-x86.git/log/?h=review-hans >> >> Note it will show up in the pdx86 review-hans branch once I've >> pushed my local branch there, which might take a while. > > Will development interests grow for the application of known scripts > also according to the semantic patch language? > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst?h=v6.8-rc1#n71 Markus, I'm not sure what your question here is? Is it: "Will coccinelle scripts be run as part of the regular patch test/merge workflow?" then the answer is that there are no plans that I'm aware of to do that at this moment. If such a thing were to be done, IMHO it would be best to have one of the existing CI systems like e.h. Intel's LKP test bot run this on linux-next, or on all the trees LKP already monitors. And it does sound like something interesting to do, but someone would need to actually setup and maintain such a CI system. If the question is: "Are patches generated by coccinelle welcome?" then the answer is "Yes patches generated by coccinelle are very much welcome". Regards, Hans