From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A20BBC433EF for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 22:29:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74E8A6115C for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 22:29:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S242577AbhIMWbC (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Sep 2021 18:31:02 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:48406 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S240592AbhIMWbB (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Sep 2021 18:31:01 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A3786113E for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 22:29:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1631572185; bh=mJarsf2XRXYc8XZQhgo+jI7Bu5nKS2CemMuIbO0H+PI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=AeYU5/Du2KXOCkXvTstjgrZN+pYDr4GRPkPEwVJGr0AdP9UUcgct+mhOQFfWT0BUR rZE0zYGk0NrjKMjRtZnVqpHJ2Xcez+s0viC659tSxbV2BjPvq3eTGJ+/sttbt028BT q2ERqNUKYHvnPBiu33+f3oq2Q7dQfyll5lq46K4iwXgQPq1LpTQNjcIbdpMfO+Zvya J/I25hWooGBiuaFMDf4PO+Z20tGzq9qzTJuCc6kY0CEFa512+7cKOImb75+vmQI3Tp gom++xkCpS2bM7flU4F364xs2XQ5nUsNWo/21VG40WKoK1FMd7hb8qvRbsOSTYH5Wn M5kb3p67y/Jew== From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org To: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org Subject: [Bug 204807] Hardware monitoring sensor nct6798d doesn't work unless acpi_enforce_resources=lax is enabled Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 22:29:44 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: AssignedTo drivers_platform_x86@kernel-bugs.osdl.org X-Bugzilla-Product: Drivers X-Bugzilla-Component: Platform_x86 X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.5 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: high X-Bugzilla-Who: greenbigfrog@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: PATCH_ALREADY_AVAILABLE X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: drivers_platform_x86@kernel-bugs.osdl.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D204807 --- Comment #106 from Jonathan (greenbigfrog@gmail.com) --- (In reply to Denis Pauk from comment #105) > (In reply to Jonathan from comment #103) > > Hi, > > (oh. Could've put my comment in the attachment comment... duh) > > I applied Denis Pauk patch today, (how I did it described in > > https://gist.github.com/greenbigfrog/26f948c9d86f1cb2fd23bfeaa23ca068 ). > > While I'm not sure if I did everything correctly, I can see nct6775 pul= ling > > in the wmi module now, so I'm fairly certain I'm running the patch. > > And yet I'm somehow still getting the acpi access warning, and no furth= er > > sensor output. > > Did I do something wrong? > >=20 > > System: Asus TUF Gaming X570-Plus (Wi-Fi) with 5600X >=20 > Could you please check with original patch from Bernhard Seibold? > And check what is value in "/sys/class/dmi/id/board_name" ? Sure. I'll try the "original" patch tomorrow. ``` cat /sys/class/dmi/id/board_name=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) ``` --=20 You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.=