From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3C03C4320A for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 06:06:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85A7A60F9B for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 06:06:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237168AbhG3GGg (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jul 2021 02:06:36 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:33936 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230282AbhG3GGd (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jul 2021 02:06:33 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EEAC61057 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 06:06:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1627625189; bh=5yFBS3tlt8s4UGkYD9laE/b5UwLp/FphUz3ijaKlWPo=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=qO+HFZwbyJE28Xcs7jLu5jfeEefLfkxVllRHevlcYhaTe+gl0xHr/dg8rx9+iCv7x H/YQ8mWxHq0FTL7KD4w4ESZ1s/HAUwT0w5jybUmEKuxNoW/x/AB4hekRRBt8l7ksvH YMOkpmGN1w7zMSSD5ztcW7s05/Y8k2xPymIea/izfkGpFR+2s98rwgueHGvM+dKTjA /FV1zBGqkh95oXZG/i7EDBZ0VBS0L5egUmNRdWUNjhmGWgNUrpdtjuxHxkGYsyR3sC kFjADChjv7CWNQzObPNGDuVlrTF63kJOy8s886xuZtserVbIYNK4XaZtYHFDEUjc3g 0Bv7uDtiLyeig== From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org To: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org Subject: [Bug 204807] Hardware monitoring sensor nct6798d doesn't work unless acpi_enforce_resources=lax is enabled Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 06:06:28 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: AssignedTo drivers_platform_x86@kernel-bugs.osdl.org X-Bugzilla-Product: Drivers X-Bugzilla-Component: Platform_x86 X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.5 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: high X-Bugzilla-Who: andy.shevchenko@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: PATCH_ALREADY_AVAILABLE X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: drivers_platform_x86@kernel-bugs.osdl.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D204807 --- Comment #80 from Andy Shevchenko (andy.shevchenko@gmail.com) --- (In reply to Bernhard Seibold from comment #79) > (In reply to Gregory Duhamel from comment #78) > > Is there any chance this patch reach upstream ? Thanks a lot Guys ! >=20 > I submitted the patch, but it was rejected and I don't intend to continue > working on it, sorry. >=20 > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-hwmon/msg11260.html To be honest I have no evidence it was rejected, rather additional work is needed. This is standard practice in OSS projects, especially big ones like kernel to reshape patch(es) a few times when it will satisfy all parties. --=20 You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.=