From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09ECBC4338F for ; Sun, 22 Aug 2021 08:47:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7B5861250 for ; Sun, 22 Aug 2021 08:47:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232503AbhHVIr5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Aug 2021 04:47:57 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:45242 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231147AbhHVIr4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Aug 2021 04:47:56 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A50D26135A for ; Sun, 22 Aug 2021 08:47:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1629622034; bh=2zM3CUCKYyMNZ7eJB//B8csRMXZd19TW5BpUMXkH21M=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=JM0mq19AXiLQsSOrotjNvoR/fmi9lvQCuDAsesaPi6R/3DPBUzWVs1H2sWWGkm/ha 0nKtqxZVwjDgnWdoo9Fk8UAbiHK/OV7rp1y4XoCr7tM5j3LQk4KqQzmbjum9zBYFKi QkRpC9YSei22DbA+J2dCa455b4WwfZRx/f24WjCEGj3+xhlo2zd1eHlQG3XU98DOCI OEtKJSN3qPBSn8KtVeZD5cqSDeY5INpY0aJJusgicoCfDrWj/RV5vkj/aeXzCLW9i5 Is1Ba/oSZY1jjIrNdyDKB+lrclkmn+S+/rQ9v3PF4NXE0B/rzM9B1xvAjFb2/vqDKS kOku3+5y575Lg== From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org To: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org Subject: [Bug 204807] Hardware monitoring sensor nct6798d doesn't work unless acpi_enforce_resources=lax is enabled Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2021 08:47:13 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: AssignedTo drivers_platform_x86@kernel-bugs.osdl.org X-Bugzilla-Product: Drivers X-Bugzilla-Component: Platform_x86 X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.5 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: high X-Bugzilla-Who: andy.shevchenko@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: PATCH_ALREADY_AVAILABLE X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: drivers_platform_x86@kernel-bugs.osdl.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D204807 --- Comment #84 from Andy Shevchenko (andy.shevchenko@gmail.com) --- (In reply to Artem S. Tashkinov from comment #83) > (In reply to Andy Shevchenko from comment #82) > >=20 > > The best what you can do is to go to the mailing list and discuss it th= ere > > with a respective maintainer. >=20 > Meanwhile this bug is not resolved and there's no (accepted) patch. The b= ug > status is wrong and misleading but I'm not going to argue :-) First of all, read comment #80, second, do not misinterpret the bug status.= It shows exactly the current state of affairs. If nobody wants to work further= on the offered change, it's not a problem of the community. Linux kernel does = not work on "take it or leave it" terms. So, instead of whining here, roll up y= our sleeves and finish the job, that would be much better! --=20 You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.=