From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
To: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 214899] ideapad-laptop: platform backlight device not working
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2021 19:35:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-214899-215701-iafppdV7Kj@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-214899-215701@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214899
Hans de Goede (jwrdegoede@fedoraproject.org) changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jwrdegoede@fedoraproject.or
| |g
--- Comment #2 from Hans de Goede (jwrdegoede@fedoraproject.org) ---
What is your kernel commandline? According to your attached dmesg it is empty,
but that seems unlikely... ?
The ideapad-laptop code has this:
if (acpi_video_get_backlight_type() == acpi_backlight_vendor) {
err = ideapad_backlight_init(priv);
if (err && err != -ENODEV)
goto backlight_failed;
}
And acpi_video_get_backlight_type() is:
enum acpi_backlight_type acpi_video_get_backlight_type(void)
{
...
if (acpi_backlight_cmdline != acpi_backlight_undef)
return acpi_backlight_cmdline;
if (acpi_backlight_dmi != acpi_backlight_undef)
return acpi_backlight_dmi;
if (!(video_caps & ACPI_VIDEO_BACKLIGHT))
return acpi_backlight_vendor;
if (acpi_osi_is_win8() && backlight_device_get_by_type(BACKLIGHT_RAW))
return acpi_backlight_native;
return acpi_backlight_video;
}
So the only way that the ideapad backlight can get registered is if:
1. You have acpi_backlight=vendor on your kernel cmdline
2. There is a DMI quirk setting for your model in the kernel which there is
not.
3. Your ACPI tables do not implement the ACPI_VIDEO_BACKLIGHT interface, but
your dmesg says:
[ 2.237329] ACPI: video: Video Device [GFX0] (multi-head: yes rom: no
post: no)
So this is unlikely, it is still possible though that your DSDT implements the
ACPI video interface but not the backlight part (that would be a first). I
cannot tell since the ACPI video interface is not in the DSDT, it is likely
defined in one of the SSDT tables. Please attach a full acpidump.
Can you try specifying: "acpi_backlight=video" on the kernel commandline and
then do:
ls /sys/class/backlight
And copy and paste the output here. This cmdline option not only helps me debug
this, but it should also workaround your backlight issue :)
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-01 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-31 19:28 [Bug 214899] New: ideapad-laptop: platform backlight device not working bugzilla-daemon
2021-11-01 19:35 ` bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2021-11-01 20:33 ` [Bug 214899] " bugzilla-daemon
2021-11-01 21:22 ` bugzilla-daemon
2021-11-01 22:17 ` bugzilla-daemon
2021-11-01 22:34 ` bugzilla-daemon
2021-11-01 22:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
2021-11-02 8:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
2021-11-02 14:15 ` bugzilla-daemon
2021-11-02 14:20 ` bugzilla-daemon
2021-11-02 14:30 ` bugzilla-daemon
2021-11-02 14:53 ` bugzilla-daemon
2021-11-02 22:06 ` bugzilla-daemon
2021-11-02 22:15 ` bugzilla-daemon
2021-11-04 21:22 ` bugzilla-daemon
2021-11-15 14:28 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-02-17 1:20 ` [Bug 214899] ideapad-laptop: brightness hotkeys " bugzilla-daemon
2022-02-17 1:21 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-04-12 18:45 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-04-12 21:46 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-04-25 16:30 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-04-26 12:54 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-04-26 12:56 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-04-27 12:03 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-04-29 15:04 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-04-29 16:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-06-10 20:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-06-12 15:25 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-06-12 15:32 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-06-13 9:18 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-06-13 10:30 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-06-13 13:17 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-06-13 21:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-06-14 13:41 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-06-14 18:48 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-06-14 19:14 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-06-15 9:39 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-06-15 9:46 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-06-15 16:36 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-06-15 20:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-06-26 15:38 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-07-03 20:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-07-04 10:12 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-07-04 10:12 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-07-04 10:14 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-07-04 10:34 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-07-05 7:59 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-07-10 15:30 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-07-30 19:04 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-07-31 1:46 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-07-31 3:41 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-10-03 14:32 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-10-03 14:32 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-10-03 14:33 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-10-03 14:33 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-10-05 23:21 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-10-06 7:38 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-10-29 2:48 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-10-30 9:54 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-01-24 8:20 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-01-24 9:32 ` bugzilla-daemon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-214899-215701-iafppdV7Kj@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/ \
--to=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox