From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C361192B81 for ; Mon, 23 Dec 2024 11:05:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1734951904; cv=none; b=vEod8MGTHAk5w6NQSzukNkSi+xSlGYB1k/I2kIEq95hbquhDepmudPiBWQ5pEcegC0VQJmAP+6ryCSyYHkzccppG3Ce/yQm4zcP+zt/HD7oqSGhxI+fELmOUsS2qTfiMf+Kv8O3GvgsLxdYlFaSmN08Ix0niy5HsAcgfetAvtyI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1734951904; c=relaxed/simple; bh=kh5knpCO1VSh7yJwCM79OpjuUFc56hAw97cb5n7S6cA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=adXXmRbQZ+MlmH0dZ+6xgfjyk5vYFgNTLjDRlMYTyy8DN/4QMrqfg15uPlvcdwbQYBPaZfOc+adgnV03lNCmd8HfgydLggrYYCHqeXA9UYmq4skWfCoZ/DlI+40Uqr6XxGxyrYYgnmbI/yy73rEnlwHfHCqNtc5I1OxvbgiwhbQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=bvrUnMSx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="bvrUnMSx" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A401C4CED6 for ; Mon, 23 Dec 2024 11:05:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1734951903; bh=kh5knpCO1VSh7yJwCM79OpjuUFc56hAw97cb5n7S6cA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=bvrUnMSx2NSpDJceLs9PdCLi/tAb6E5veBzFnQ02qLHeI9UxlF2rvoLWnmjXq7cQ/ qSMenOd0jgKmsIBnEQUtdZApsAIXLEDSEvrLEuRhMibHybTfuAgwPf920UijQWr4lf k7thBnz/5LqqIxn1CFRBpOU+fo09Sf8+h334gJky+IZDkfBwRXfMQaAxTOVgcPSmrj 3ELHf3g7kkEuj5JLloy6Xkx6VCgc52TagSC73KuZUMz9egllBl0yBkzg4U1nXRQM9t WRce14+/qLS3kxY3Q1gifU2kbh5QohcPN7ACp9wcAH3rw5iIIzsSDZVpYGbj6LbB2j j+8UCIzFgUqkw== Received: by aws-us-west-2-korg-bugzilla-1.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 78D71C41613; Mon, 23 Dec 2024 11:05:03 +0000 (UTC) From: bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org To: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org Subject: [Bug 219495] [TPM2] tpm_tis driver crashs during the boot time. Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2024 11:05:03 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: AssignedTo drivers_platform_x86@kernel-bugs.osdl.org X-Bugzilla-Product: Drivers X-Bugzilla-Component: Platform_x86 X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.5 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jarkko@kernel.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: drivers_platform_x86@kernel-bugs.osdl.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D219495 --- Comment #60 from jarkko@kernel.org --- (In reply to andy.liang from comment #54) > (In reply to jarkko from comment #51) > > (In reply to jarkko from comment #31) > > > OK, I somehow managed to miss it as it had different naming convention > > sorry. > > >=20 > > > Anywhow, I see this: > > >=20 > > > [ 10.693310][ T1] tpm_tis STM0925:00: 2.0 TPM (device-id 0x3, re= v-id > > 0) > > > [ 10.848132][ T1] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > > > [ 10.853559][ T1] WARNING: CPU: 59 PID: 1 at mm/page_alloc.c:4727 > > > __alloc_pages_noprof+0x2ca/0x330 > > > [ 10.862827][ T1] Modules linked in: > > > [ 10.866671][ T1] CPU: 59 UID: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tain= ted > > > 6.12.0-lp155.2.g52785e2-default #1 openSUSE Tumbleweed (unreleased) > > > 588cd98293a7c9eba9013378d807364c088c9375 > > > [ 10.882741][ T1] Hardware name: HPE ProLiant DL320 Gen12/ProLia= nt > > > DL320 Gen12, BIOS 1.20 10/28/2024 > > > [ 10.892170][ T1] RIP: 0010:__alloc_pages_noprof+0x2ca/0x330 > > > [ 10.898103][ T1] Code: 24 08 e9 4a fe ff ff e8 34 36 fa ff e9 8= 8 fe > > ff > > > ff 83 fe 0a 0f 86 b3 fd ff ff 80 3d 01 e7 ce 01 00 75 09 c6 05 f8 e6 = ce > 01 > > > 01 <0f> 0b 45 31 ff e9 e5 fe ff ff f7 c2 00 00 08 00 75 42 89 d9 80 e1 > > > [ 10.917750][ T1] RSP: 0000:ffffb7cf40077980 EFLAGS: 00010246 > > > [ 10.923777][ T1] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000040cc0 RC= X: > > > 0000000000000000 > > > [ 10.931727][ T1] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000000000000c RD= I: > > > 0000000000040cc0 > > > [ 10.939678][ T1] RBP: 000000000000000c R08: ffffffffbb6fdc67 R0= 9: > > > 0000000000000000 > > > [ 10.947626][ T1] R10: ffffb7cf40077ac8 R11: 0000000000000000 R1= 2: > > > 0000000000000000 > > > [ 10.955560][ T1] R13: 00000000ffffffff R14: 0000000000000cc0 R1= 5: > > > ffff9a5c051cc000 > > > [ 10.963507][ T1] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) > > GS:ffff9a6348780000(0000) > > > knlGS:0000000000000000 > > > [ 10.972405][ T1] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050= 033 > > > [ 10.978944][ T1] CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 0000000184638001 CR= 4: > > > 0000000000f70ef0 > > > [ 10.986891][ T1] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR= 2: > > > 0000000000000000 > > > [ 10.994837][ T1] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff07f0 DR= 7: > > > 0000000000000400 > > > [ 11.002770][ T1] PKRU: 55555554 > > > [ 11.006256][ T1] Call Trace: > > > [ 11.009479][ T1] > > > [ 11.012352][ T1] ? __alloc_pages_noprof+0x2ca/0x330 > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > RSI=3D0x0c, which maps to the parameter 'order' in __alloc_pages_nopr= of(), > > > which allocates=20 > > > 4096*2**0xc =3D 16777216 =3D 16 MiB of memory. This means that memory > consumed > > > by the log is in the range 8 MiB < N <=3D 16 MiB. > >=20 > > I don't understand why ESI=3D0x0c while TPM2 table has size 0x800000, w= hich > > maps to the order 0x0b as 4096 * 2**0x0b =3D 0x800000. > >=20 > > It looks like as if TPM2 table and this transcript are either from > different > > machines or different BIOS versions. I'm not sure how to otherwise expl= ain > > that difference. > >=20 > > For 0x0c, the last line in that TPM2 dump screenshot should start: 0000= 0001 > > not 00008000. >=20 > Sorry about that. The machine I had in November is different from the one= in > December. I uploaded a new dmesg with Kernel 6.12.6. Thank you.=20 > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=3D307386 OK thanks for responding! I just needed confirmation that I'm not interpret= ing the log incorrectly :-) --=20 You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.=