From: bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org
To: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 221065] ideapad_acpi: unexpected charge_types spam on Yoga Pro 7 14ASP9
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2026 16:28:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-221065-215701-VW4g8xWyrS@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-221065-215701@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=221065
--- Comment #41 from Rong Zhang (i@rong.moe) ---
(In reply to Avraham Hollander from comment #36)
> I don't *seem* to be getting the mutex error with it blacklisted. However,
> I'm still getting the original error from ideapad_acpi.
That should be a good sign.
Not making the ideapad-laptop error disappear hints that there must be other
methods holding the ECMT mutex for too long after resuming from s2idle.
Debugging with https://docs.kernel.org/firmware-guide/acpi/debug.html may
reveal more details.
(In reply to Avraham Hollander from comment #39)
> Question: If the problem lies purely in the DSDT, would it not be possible
> to test a fix with a DSDT override? I am open to doing that.
>
> I think it should also be possible to fix these errors with a DSDT patch?
From my perspective, everything built around ECMT is broken. Fixing ECCC, WTER,
and _BTP by overriding DSDT only resolves #2 (see comment #33).
To resolve #1, every method that relies on ECMT must explicitly check the
helper functions' return values and must stop propagating nonsense on error.
Of course, you may lengthen the timeouts of acquiring ECMT and pray for
success...
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-17 16:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-09 7:50 [Bug 221065] New: ideapad_acpi: unexpected charge_types spam on Yoga Pro 7 14ASP9 bugzilla-daemon
2026-02-09 9:10 ` [Bug 221065] " bugzilla-daemon
2026-02-09 11:47 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-02-09 12:06 ` [Bug 221065] New: " Rong Zhang
2026-02-09 12:11 ` [Bug 221065] " bugzilla-daemon
2026-02-10 17:56 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-02-10 18:44 ` Rong Zhang
2026-02-10 17:56 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-02-10 17:57 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-02-10 18:49 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-02-10 18:57 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-02-10 18:58 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-02-10 19:01 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-02-10 19:17 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-02-10 19:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-02-10 19:25 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-02-10 19:28 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-02-10 21:20 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-02-10 21:28 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-02-10 21:30 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-02-10 21:32 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-02-10 21:39 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-02-10 21:42 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-02-10 21:43 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-02-10 21:53 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-02-11 14:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-02-11 15:02 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-02-11 15:03 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-02-11 15:17 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-02-11 15:17 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-02-11 15:35 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-02-11 15:41 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-02-11 16:58 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-02-11 17:32 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-02-11 17:59 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-02-11 18:04 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-02-13 13:20 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-02-13 13:22 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-02-17 1:37 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-02-17 1:59 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-02-17 2:06 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-02-17 2:32 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-02-17 2:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-02-17 2:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-02-17 16:28 ` bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2026-03-02 10:56 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-03-02 11:06 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-03-02 13:45 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-03-02 14:41 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-03-02 16:24 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-03-02 16:35 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-03-04 18:25 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-03-04 18:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-03-09 9:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-03-10 18:01 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-03-24 10:41 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-03-24 18:40 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-03-24 18:48 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-04-01 12:58 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-04-01 13:35 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-04-07 19:02 ` bugzilla-daemon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-221065-215701-VW4g8xWyrS@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/ \
--to=bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox