From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8065114E2DA for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2024 16:24:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728145463; cv=none; b=DXGrNDFiB6bIF/weWx8/GHxLNvibMSV2ZuckWRUnRKvG0Pqjh9Nk6mqvxT6ZUBAR2E3JcOeLDfdeEEV92ocDv9W/ESEVPXerE+CwEbryxTDDycrDuUwpAGu633TWfhtGH5ZxbFe71sTp4tQyoHRFFVocYcUuDY3hlfvd1k0wkug= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728145463; c=relaxed/simple; bh=CeVoX48NXn1L/SFRpHDcpdd0HSdyqTIYT57DWi2WFLk=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=NdyFpKyPgBi9rtscii6kORp+be0eBkPfS0PIwITPmygXe2c6/ihs8B91anXIw/8gvGZz+qeXm5sxZE4AxDeKY8C0+bLuh69YWncJuyjF+X09dkoXWc8+CEzZ1l3pvBioRARI5f7lWY4kZD9wRHlxBtK4p1TLvm9Ha/WssgJs5w0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=BU/Nj7eM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="BU/Nj7eM" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1728145460; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=HySLp1gZrJOhtmnbvjvLrkEQ7EK5lPOt+awQiFCFWPc=; b=BU/Nj7eMqDMVh6VeOmZfxKd5bSkwEMGkJemSIerqCk5MHSklNiIT/MRN+J5+IruDII2I/3 32BlcNQL7BnK6KH5MLfGnsG9Xhy56FpuJzusphPN8tJEFrzeaScSG6udeTEVpqFf0Y5Mn+ 3TxjyK8w3U0bWNy+CrpEQ3yRXPuquN4= Received: from mail-ed1-f70.google.com (mail-ed1-f70.google.com [209.85.208.70]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-659-OLnuR0DZNgiY1yPp0vaNTA-1; Sat, 05 Oct 2024 12:24:18 -0400 X-MC-Unique: OLnuR0DZNgiY1yPp0vaNTA-1 Received: by mail-ed1-f70.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5c829e582e5so2529231a12.1 for ; Sat, 05 Oct 2024 09:24:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1728145457; x=1728750257; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=HySLp1gZrJOhtmnbvjvLrkEQ7EK5lPOt+awQiFCFWPc=; b=W++K8yZqA+SMgDi/etKm2hvQn7IfcNO6FxGxJDJhFLgVS0WcA8aApj8fLuYp7BdaU/ 06D1ljjIOLzCyDQaotzdCHr/olrW2vTSXnsqeaokiCkPTd4/5Rb9VeiDydAJkiOrVo84 BzesvBU/aNw6dVrXAVEaciLthrd/rKroNN89BuGZ1uwQ/Rr0DUd9JbrcrT8jlVbNCHP3 RMN5tj4ugugxfGxrj86qGY563F56WddbnuZyE4eLgEipzZ5RTLZL9AKbeQiZNNaj0Unv aHvkl8jPbLyrCcULe1FHZc/LMKT0LBo9RElgNNP/SvSDZYkbErLE9fJqSbppWbfIoJVj yqRA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCU5IaRk3FSoCKNtTHbbFgwSVJmCgYw1WLAFG0XX+yXj1+amId3GpVFtPokDhG/i6BFsbBsVp5wljBYIMAoscjsSPS8s@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyG+/f8NMxE1N+pcpXxWSydlj1UxmlvsxB3jAEu2SRRCXEDR/23 3X9ny/HDU05IYFVTZSaepbf8Cum/HHcT0U8ThT6H8e3tfkKTG+52VEphOCq/KchQPNfE1hydM4T /VARsdXE9i+lLo1iteT0ciG6o0bj8kUnWlNGFL3DdcxnZU0mLDmwZm+hZC2DImNhVsJpgnFs= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:2681:b0:a8a:91d1:5262 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a991bd71ddcmr720127166b.28.1728145457500; Sat, 05 Oct 2024 09:24:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGIXwe6jRK6F5oUpBTo1GVkdjoj3AAvgE8smzJpoWOxZ3irTCSG4Ywm0zTP8GHmyJWLQii+/g== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:2681:b0:a8a:91d1:5262 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a991bd71ddcmr720125066b.28.1728145457091; Sat, 05 Oct 2024 09:24:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2001:1c00:c32:7800:5bfa:a036:83f0:f9ec? (2001-1c00-0c32-7800-5bfa-a036-83f0-f9ec.cable.dynamic.v6.ziggo.nl. [2001:1c00:c32:7800:5bfa:a036:83f0:f9ec]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a640c23a62f3a-a993a7cfcfcsm99426466b.143.2024.10.05.09.24.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 05 Oct 2024 09:24:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2024 18:24:15 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] acpi/x86: s2idle: move Display off/on calls outside suspend (fixes ROG Ally suspend) To: Antheas Kapenekakis Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, Mario Limonciello , luke@ljones.dev, me@kylegospodneti.ch, Denis Benato References: <20240922172258.48435-1-lkml@antheas.dev> <134adbb7-06c5-4b6a-a8b9-abb973784f73@redhat.com> Content-Language: en-US, nl From: Hans de Goede In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Antheas, On 5-Oct-24 5:10 PM, Antheas Kapenekakis wrote: > Hi Hans, > >> Thank you for your work on this and thank you for the comprehensive write-up >> on how Windows does modern standby. >> >> First of all may I suggest that you take the above write-up, minus the ROG >> Ally specific bits and turn this into a new documentation file under >> Documentation/power ? And also document at which point Linux currently >> makes the various transitions. > > I will try to move some of that documentation there, this is a great idea. > >> And then in patches where you move the transitions, also update the docs >> on what Linux does to match. >> >> I have read the discussion about tying the display on/off calls to CRTC state >> and/or exposing a userspace knob for that. I think that this needs more >> discussion / design work. > > Yes, you are right. To become a knob this would require a much bigger > discussion. I would also like to move Sleep calls as part of that. The > Legion Go and OneXPlayer devices turn off their controllers as part of > that and other modern standby devices limit their power envelope > (perhaps the Legion Go too). I think the Sleep call is where most of > the userspace usability will come from. Display On/Off is a bit of a > NOOP on most devices. > > As for the LSB0 enter and exit, I do not know where the correct place > for those would be, and perhaps someone from Microsoft needs to be > consulted on that. The documentation is very vague. However it is > clear to me that they should be close to where they are right now, so > they very likely do not need to move. > > There is also the new _DSM intent to turn display on 9 call. Which > meshes with the sleep call. That call is made before Sleep Exit, if > the kernel knows that the wake-up will cause the display to turn on, > to boost the thermal envelope of the device and help it wake up > quicker. If the Sleep call is moved then we would also have to > introduce that somewhere to avoid wake-up time regressions on devices > that support it, which also raises the question of how would the > kernel decide if an interrupt will cause the display to turn on before > unfreezing userspace (bulk of resume) (or should it be done after > unfreezing?). > >> OTOH IMHO it would be good to take patches 1 - 3 . Certainly 1 + 2 would >> be good to have. 3 is a bit unfortunate and not necessary with the current >> special ROG Ally handling in the asus-wmi driver. It might be better to >> just keep the quirks there. > > From what I know Luke plans to remove that quirk ASAP due to new > firmware. I would keep it around until this patch series merges > personally and remove it as part of that. Ack I replied to Luke to say something like that. > As it will probably cause regressions if both are in place I don't see how having both this patch-sets + the asus-wmi quirks will cause regressions? The suspend delay will be done twice, but that is harmless. > and require manual intervention if > either is not. I will also note that the quirk in asus-wmi calls the > Display On/Off calls a second time and during the suspend sequence, > which is not in any way proper. AFAICT asus-wmi does not call the display on / off callbacks instead it directly calls "\\_SB.PCI0.SBRG.EC0.CSEE" to control the power ? > So if future devices need this kind of > quirk, it really does not seem like a good idea to me to paper over > their problems by calling the notifications a second time in random > platform drivers. There is the question of where that quirk should be > placed, that is true, but I IMO it should be a pm problem. > > Perhaps not in the location where I put it though and perhaps it > should be done with LSB0 callbacks instead. Although, being done this > way allows for it to blend with the suspend sequence. Ideally, the > Display Off delay would be blended with userspace going down such that > if e.g., there is heavy userspace activity that requires ~2s to > freeze, the quirk would add no delay. Instead, it would only add delay > if userspace freezes quickly (less than .5s). Same can be said with > Sleep Entry and beginning prepare_late, which blocks the EC interrupts > (that would need a lot of investigation though). > > On that note, it seems to me that the Ally has 2 bugs related to the > _DSM calls 3 and 4. First bug is that Display On is gated on current > firmware and only works when the USB subsystem is powered on. > Allegedly, this is fixed on the upcoming firmware but it is not > something I have verified personally. I will verify it in 10 days or > so, if the new firmware does not fail QA I guess. > > However, there is a second bug with Display Off in _DSM 4. The > controller of the Ally needs time to power off, around 500ms. > Otherwise it gets its power clipped and/or does not power off > correctly. This causes the issues mentioned in the discussion and I > have no indication that this is fixed with newer controller firmware. > It is also my understanding that most of the testing of the new > firmware happened with the asus-wmi quirk in place, which papers over > that issue, so removing the quirk might be premature in any case. Ok. > We have currently released this patch series in Bazzite and I am happy > to report that it completely fixes all controller related issues in > the Ally devices and makes them behave exactly as they do in Windows, > regardless of firmware and bug for bug. > > So we will be keeping it around and extending it as appropriate to > include the Sleep calls. I am reminded multiple times per week that > the Ally has TDP suspend bugs, where if the user is playing a heavy > game, the EC of the device tends to get stuck at 6W and fail to > respond after waking the device. So moving calls 7, 8 is the natural > next step in this investigation. I already have a draft patch on > standby, that we plan to AB test soon. > >> IMHO it would be good to submit a v2 of just patches 1 - 3 run through >> checkpatch. Also the commit message of patch 3 should point to the existing >> quirk code in asus-wmi.c and mention that then is no longer necessary after >> patch 3, then we can discuss what is the best place for these quirks. > > I did run it through before sending the patch. However, some of the > warnings were a bit cryptic to me... I will run it again. > > I will add a note for asus-wmi on future patch series. > > First 3 patches of the series are designed to NOOP before patch 4. Did > you mean patch 3 (which adds the delay) instead of 4? Ah I misread the series and failed to notice that patch 4 actually hooks things up, I was under the impression that patch 4 hooks things up. But I did mean that patch 3 might lead to discussion not patch 4. Now that I have taken a better look some more detailed review comments: * Patches 1 and 2 should be squashed into a single patch IMHO. * Patch 3 adds the quirks to kernel/power/suspend.c but this really should be added to drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c and then do the sleep as part of the display_off callback. * Given my comment on patch 3 I would swap the order of patch 3 and 4 and only add the quirks after moving the display off ACPI call to the new callback * Patch 4 does too much in a single patch, specifically besides actually implementing the new callbacks it also does s/SCREEN/DISPLAY on all the ACPI_LPS0_* defines. This renaming of the defines must be done in a separate patch. Regards, Hans