From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Bhardwaj, Rajneesh" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] x86/cpu: Add Icelake to Intel family Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 22:05:18 +0530 Message-ID: References: <20190213150810.32750-1-rajneesh.bhardwaj@linux.intel.com> <20190213150810.32750-7-rajneesh.bhardwaj@linux.intel.com> <20190213152326.GA1883@zn.tnic> <308aa852-b2c3-3336-707f-d54de6ad77b7@linux.intel.com> <20190213160405.GC1883@zn.tnic> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20190213160405.GC1883@zn.tnic> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Borislav Petkov Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, dvhart@infradead.org, andy@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , Dave Hansen , "David E. Box" , Srinivas Pandruvada List-Id: platform-driver-x86.vger.kernel.org I sure did, perhaps it wasn't clear in my response. I can remove coreboot link in next version but please clarify whether i should keep other link that i mentioned or just keep the commit without any link? On 13-Feb-19 9:34 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 09:13:01PM +0530, Bhardwaj, Rajneesh wrote: >> Icelake related information is  available here https://www.intel.in/content/www/in/en/design/products-and-solutions/processors-and-chipsets/ice-lake/overview.html >> but it may require a login either with Intel or a Partner ID. >> >> The CPUID mentioned in this document is 0x706E0 which is same as per this >> coreboot link. > You did not read what I wrote. >