From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Lezcano Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/11] Stop monitoring disabled devices Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 20:33:45 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20200629122925.21729-1-andrzej.p@collabora.com> <3d03d1a2-ac06-b69b-93cb-e0203be62c10@collabora.com> <47111821-d691-e71d-d740-e4325e290fa4@linaro.org> <4353a939-3f5e-8369-5bc0-ad8162b5ffc7@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Len Brown , Vishal Kulkarni , "David S . Miller" , Jiri Pirko , Ido Schimmel , Johannes Berg , Emmanuel Grumbach , Luca Coelho , Intel Linux Wireless , Kalle Valo , Peter Kaestle , Darren Hart , Andy Shevchenko , Sebastian Reichel , Miquel Raynal , Amit Kucheria , Support Opensource , Shawn Guo List-Id: platform-driver-x86.vger.kernel.org On 30/06/2020 18:56, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote: > Hi, > > W dniu 30.06.2020 o 17:53, Daniel Lezcano pisze: >> On 30/06/2020 17:29, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote: >>> Hi Daniel, >>> >>> W dniu 30.06.2020 o 16:53, Daniel Lezcano pisze: >>>> On 30/06/2020 15:43, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote: >>>>> Hi Daniel, >>>>> >>>>> I am reading the logs and can't find anything specific to thermal. >>>>> >>>>> What I can see is >>>>> >>>>> "random: crng init done" >>>>> >>>>> with large times (~200s) and then e.g. >>>>> >>>>> 'auto-login-action timed out after 283 seconds' >>>>> >>>>> I'm looking at e.g. >>>>> https://storage.kernelci.org/thermal/testing/v5.8-rc3-11-gf5e50bf4d3ef/arm/multi_v7_defconfig/gcc-8/lab-baylibre/baseline-imx6q-sabrelite.html >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> f5e50bf4d3ef is PATCH 11/11. Does the problem happen at PATCH 1-10/11? >>> PATCH 11/11 renames a method and the code compiles, so it seems >>> unlikely that this is causing problems. One should never say never, >>> though ;) >> >> The sha1 is just the HEAD for the kernel reference. The regression >> happens with your series, somewhere. >> >>> The reported failure is not due to some test failing but rather due >>> to timeout logging into the test system. Could it be that there is >>> some other problem? >> >> I did reproduce: >> >> v5.8-rc3 + series => imx6 hang at boot time >> v5.8-rc3 => imx6 boots correctly >> > > I kindly ask for a bisect. I will give a try but it is a very long process as the board is running on kernelci. I was not able to reproduce it on imx7 despite it is the same sensor :/ -- Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog