From: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>
To: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
"Hans de Goede" <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] platform/x86: wmi: Use ACPI device name in netlink event
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 16:03:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f07b3156-2bc8-49bf-bc08-e40209b89cf1@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <61d23b7d-8e47-acf8-f3b7-bea1544ca8fa@linux.intel.com>
Am 22.01.24 um 13:47 schrieb Ilpo Järvinen:
> On Mon, 22 Jan 2024, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> On 1/21/24 21:08, Armin Wolf wrote:
>>> The device name inside the ACPI netlink event is limited to
>>> 15 characters, so the WMI device name will get truncated.
>>>
>>> This can be observed with kacpimon when receiving an event
>>> from WMI device "9DBB5994-A997-11DA-B012-B622A1EF5492":
>>>
>>> netlink: 9DBB5994-A997- 000000d0 00000000
>>>
>>> Fix this by using the shorter device name from the ACPI
>>> bus device instead. This still allows users to uniquely
>>> identify the WMI device by using the notify id (0xd0).
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>
>>> ---
>>> Changes since v1:
>>> - use acpi_dev_name() helper function
>> I'm a bit divided on this patch. I agree the new way of doing
>> things is better, but technically this is a bit of a userspace API
>> break.
>>
>> I guess we could hope that nothing depends on the old netlink API
>> format / name but I'm not sure we can rely on that ...
>>
>> Ilpo, Andy do you have any opinion on this ?
> Hi Armin,
>
> Have you tried to conduct debian code search to find the code using this?
>
I did, but i found nothing.
I am also preparing to properly initialize the device_class field in another patch,
and this also has the potential of breaking userspace if some users created custom
acpid configs to listen to those events.
I think we can revert those changes anytime if someones turns out to be actually depending
on them.
Armin Wolf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-22 15:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-21 20:08 [PATCH v2] platform/x86: wmi: Use ACPI device name in netlink event Armin Wolf
2024-01-22 11:29 ` Hans de Goede
2024-01-22 12:47 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-01-22 15:03 ` Armin Wolf [this message]
2024-01-24 11:06 ` Hans de Goede
2024-01-24 11:10 ` Ilpo Järvinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f07b3156-2bc8-49bf-bc08-e40209b89cf1@gmx.de \
--to=w_armin@gmx.de \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox