From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Mark Pearson <markpearson@lenovo.com>
Cc: markgross@kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Documentation: syfs-class-firmware-attributes: Lenovo Certificate support
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2022 18:23:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f9151a77-f7ad-78cc-41e5-e5d13945c3a2@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <90f1a4ce-a3ba-ed14-f27a-348af368afad@lenovo.com>
Hi,
On 3/17/22 18:08, Mark Pearson wrote:
>
> Hi Hans,
>
> Thanks for the review
>
> On 2022-03-17 06:58, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 3/15/22 20:56, Mark Pearson wrote:
>>> Certificate based authentication is available as an alternative to
>>> password based authentication.
>>>
>>> The WMI commands are cryptographically signed using a separate
>>> signing server and will be verified by the BIOS before being
>>> accepted.
>>>
>>> This commit details the fields that are needed to support that
>>> implementation. At present the changes are intended for Lenovo
>>> platforms, but have been designed to keep them as flexible as possible
>>> for future implementations from other vendors.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mark Pearson <markpearson@lenovo.com>
>>
>> This looks good, but looking at this a second time I still
>> have one open question:
>>
>> What is the difference between removing a certificate and
>> switching back to password auth?
> The main difference is clear goes to no-authentication, and switching
> obviously switches to password
>
>>
>> Looking at the WMI calls there are 4 different calls:
>>
>> LENOVO_SET_BIOS_CERT_GUID
>> LENOVO_UPDATE_BIOS_CERT_GUID
>> LENOVO_CLEAR_BIOS_CERT_GUI
>> LENOVO_CERT_TO_PASSWORD_GUID
>>
>> Going by these names I guess there can be only 1 certificate
>> otherwise I would expect:
>>
>> 1. add/remove naming
>> 2. update to take an id of which certificate to replace
>>
> Correct - there is only one certificate
>
>> So I guess that LENOVO_CLEAR_BIOS_CERT_GUI disables all
>> authentication. IOW, installing a cert replaces/clears
>> the supervisor password and the difference between
>> clearing the certificate and cert-to-password is that
>> after clearing it we end up with no supervisor password
>> set, where as cert-to-password sets the passed in password
>> as the new supervisor password?
> Correct
>
>>
>> Or does clearing the certificate fall back to the old
>> supervisor password if one was set? (that might lead to
>> some interesting issues if users clear the certificate
>> many years after the password was last used ...)
> clearing reverts to no password
>
>>
>> Given where we are in the cycle I was planning on adding
>> this to my review-hans branch so that it could maybe still
>> get into 5.18, but given the above questions as well
>> the remark about the test X1 BIOS you are using I've
>> a feeling it would be better to give this some more time
>> to bake and target 5.19 instead. Do you agree ?
>
> I'd love to have it in 5.18 as I expect his feature to be available in
> our 2022 platforms and they're all going to start landing in the next
> couple of months. If that's unrealistic I can live with it so I'll defer
> to your preference
The 5.18 merge window starts coming Monday, if you can get me
a v3 with the last few minor items addressed sometime tomorrow,
then I can throw it into my for-next branch and if it does not
cause any issues there then it can make 5.18.
But if anything non trivial pops up while this is baking in -next
I'll probably drop it from -next and then this becomes 5.19 material.
Regards,
Hans
>
>>
>> Regardless of this is 5.18 or 5.19 material can you? :
>>
>> a) confirm that I've understood how the clearing vs cert-to-password
>> works correctly ?
> Confirmed :)
>
>> b) confirm that despite you using a test BIOS the WMI API for this is
>> final and that it will *not* change before there are production
>> BIOS-es with this ?
> I think I'm safe confirming this (I always get slightly nervous as it's
> outside my control, and weird things happen...) We have an internal spec for
> this feature and this implementation is meeting that spec. I'd be very
> surprised if there are extra changes.
>
>> c) submit a version to clarify the clearing vs cert-to-password thing, e.g.:
>>
>> @@ -276,6 +276,8 @@ Description:
>>
>> You cannot enable certificate authentication if a supervisor password
>> has not been set.
>> + Clearing the certificate results in no bios-admin authentication
>> + method being configured allowing anyone to make changes.
>> After any of these operations the system must reboot for the changes to
>> take effect.
>>
> Ack will do
>
> Mark
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-17 17:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-15 19:56 [PATCH v2 1/2] Documentation: syfs-class-firmware-attributes: Lenovo Certificate support Mark Pearson
2022-03-15 19:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] platform/x86: think-lmi: Certificate authentication support Mark Pearson
2022-03-17 11:21 ` Hans de Goede
2022-03-17 17:13 ` [External] " Mark Pearson
2022-03-17 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] Documentation: syfs-class-firmware-attributes: Lenovo Certificate support Hans de Goede
2022-03-17 17:08 ` [External] " Mark Pearson
2022-03-17 17:23 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2022-03-17 18:08 ` Mark Pearson
2022-03-17 18:16 ` Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f9151a77-f7ad-78cc-41e5-e5d13945c3a2@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=markgross@kernel.org \
--cc=markpearson@lenovo.com \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox