From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.223.172.38 with SMTP id v35csp1224959wrc; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 01:36:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QC3E2m9IjpqTUGIgM5Uvs8sdq2N3XUTIk7HlQbkc8QVvNuzWENxJAte9+0JzVaQ3neV7sRo X-Received: by 10.200.8.72 with SMTP id x8mr2880891qth.108.1504859763763; Fri, 08 Sep 2017 01:36:03 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1504859763; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Q29hyG8KGkSSSEy72RSop5gAht3zGKouExgF3AsOGrW/HZB0gYCsQOjEhTZL91BlVG c+fX8TZtEnMdxAAMnD0pYBp0Uehr/CwlqyGLm+ECUfBNbzEWVLsW0XF4Z+PICHk9Ysa7 6ZaJn4G6QkYQlj0scTw9m82UBcc9MWdecGjRA1JQYJpCHTavFZsBg3LzSqpXfteyekTK HIRaVnwFq/WYa0LLsuKUvKKa4aV6BHxaS5lG6Gsoq7gb5fRmAYXmU1f2SDUAuQigVk7R b+/PL2715RuBC3R+mRelOkZdoJhB1krgy/LMRISIhVk2y+CHQsG8zvgopjBetL48ny/N IqNg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=sender:errors-to:cc:list-subscribe:list-help:list-post:list-archive :list-unsubscribe:list-id:precedence:subject :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:to:dmarc-filter :arc-authentication-results; bh=xxKURk3Vv7RNCPTIpljKxYnEv1MkmLd98wR65J3f5GA=; b=eA4WQoTOnBTcpfGtFBTynM/PGEblOUJMkdUhFffUrAfphYEphoLrxSM8x0HhOeizAY GDgaFqrulKvrlfZFaQNdg6eZGbblMy9HWUQP4Cx1sxhhKPBk+KYuZJ62OpSX+BFdc++W WizFbjQ+OPFfS/Ths/Mfo7O0vIOxjr3i9ZGEUQ2Vh8oClh0Mouulc+e3By4BrdXSZPdx RdkdNaIyvALqNB6srA+yiC4r7XLj5cZxZ939JqJXydfs+2w3cwxKBifGmvBvS9cPsbAz +WOwe46meD4ttOULivhbm64wKKLFWC9QUqdRzqWxazC2uO8upH6lRoxDhnQ8dmkn+UZ1 bw3Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org designates 2001:4830:134:3::11 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org. [2001:4830:134:3::11]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u11si1478968qka.403.2017.09.08.01.36.03 for (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 08 Sep 2017 01:36:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org designates 2001:4830:134:3::11 as permitted sender) client-ip=2001:4830:134:3::11; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org designates 2001:4830:134:3::11 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: from localhost ([::1]:43885 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dqEld-0007fR-IQ for alex.bennee@linaro.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2017 04:36:01 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33575) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dqElT-0007ek-Fp for qemu-arm@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2017 04:35:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dqElL-0004Fl-ND for qemu-arm@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2017 04:35:51 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:46098) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dqElL-0004DS-FL; Fri, 08 Sep 2017 04:35:43 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53DC981DE4; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 08:35:41 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 53DC981DE4 Authentication-Results: ext-mx01.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx01.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=eric.auger@redhat.com Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn-117-1.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.117.1]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1663600C0; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 08:35:29 +0000 (UTC) To: Peter Maydell References: <1504286483-23327-1-git-send-email-eric.auger@redhat.com> From: Auger Eric Message-ID: <05efe60e-e4d0-24e1-548b-b587bf5153ff@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2017 10:35:28 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.25]); Fri, 08 Sep 2017 08:35:41 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH v7 00/20] ARM SMMUv3 Emulation Support X-BeenThere: qemu-arm@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Radha Mohan , Andrew Jones , Trey Cain , Radha.Chintakuntla@cavium.com, Sunil.Goutham@cavium.com, "Michael S. Tsirkin" , jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com, Tomasz Nowicki , Will Deacon , QEMU Developers , Peter Xu , Alex Williamson , qemu-arm , Christoffer Dall , robin.murphy@arm.com, wtownsen@redhat.com, Bharat Bhushan , Prem Mallappa , eric.auger.pro@gmail.com Errors-To: qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-arm" X-TUID: mSoNLDmAj9Kh Hi Peter, On 07/09/2017 14:39, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 1 September 2017 at 18:21, Eric Auger wrote: >> This series implements the emulation code for ARM SMMUv3. >> >> Changes since v6: >> - DPDK testpmd now running on guest with 2 assigned VFs >> - Changed the instantiation method: add the following option to >> the QEMU command line >> -device smmuv3 # for virtio/vhost use cases >> -device smmuv3,caching-mode # for vfio use cases (based on [1]) >> - splitted the series into smaller patches to allow the review >> - the VFIO integration based on "tlbi-on-map" smmuv3 driver >> is isolated from the rest: last 2 patches, not for upstream. >> This is shipped for testing/bench until a better solution is found. >> - Reworked permission flag checks and event generation > > Hi Eric -- I see you've upgraded this from an RFC to a PATCH set. > Do you want the patches reviewed and (eventually) taken into git > now? Yes I split the series to make it more reviewable and from a functional point of view I have run all major use cases. So now I would encourage people to start reviewing the series (focusing on patches 1-18). Thanks Eric > > thanks > -- PMM >