From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.28.4.212 with SMTP id 203csp972315wme; Fri, 27 Apr 2018 09:37:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZoI+gSWGidJhPY/Pcjk7WLpVXpeF1Oi/gp+eK5jVDfy6KZbVaSHzt6efqdMDXbB7hfBezhl X-Received: by 2002:ac8:4141:: with SMTP id e1-v6mr2353092qtm.324.1524847022269; Fri, 27 Apr 2018 09:37:02 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1524847022; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=AIC7EZYD4PSY24EvanmZydfGtZCHHL9vcbqG08XO3dc/NBSfXriokGpKdpBBlGcYL5 Btw75aga50ICdqcw9OZ2SWorKElltCSZ1kvjSYaJsN02Zo/91Nw9h72yTUQUsc4+0S1u h03U0mU5V3dkOUAB8XznNAPLoJr7rmsH1ycvDysumu5+VGdrtKqeWsmlz0ED9zgeBeQj 73doPuMix47lcHRR2Cx1RmeH9SxT/8sWtLDI2Zgw0oW8JOqVTku7Wr7FzqKvZL9FC5Av 4qPufZepOQDtMMoLXZa91f0w2p4ZJexzpiBXknvmGzYNoyw4mCwNfiCB8QeenL+8QwEb b/UA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=sender:errors-to:cc:list-subscribe:list-help:list-post:list-archive :list-unsubscribe:list-id:precedence:subject :content-transfer-encoding:content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version :user-agent:date:message-id:from:references:to :arc-authentication-results; bh=iJUW3OfL9JF3WxICHI71tKIRARIM4wIOrZi3FDuPQ4Y=; b=xO8+/wcb9O9X/u8cVHDKRoiv10nYHs+8gV/KGvfioctJSmXgpmdeUXdJelhhnet5yK mTFb4j0IHG0cUeuvO25k+WH/8nIHaRBGihLBnllxcU/IlCpp/6f9JdRix5/NodPFZnfo NigqUWD8fmgFAPORycARdZSF12wAelnMPVLiHIHzgUC6rQcZn5FM2BBIC7DixhE8g+5V sqhdccdOe67z/yMrFvGp9j1lIXk/1xdLiWsKZ/cTsQHwWkslgaIv5mwE1py7LUMCvfTr jYSU2XDwkBsOhyTOXf13nTeGREG8UBDYxiicO7RmgI2nUPvd5YF23NuO2HolZm7+2QKJ yp2Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org designates 2001:4830:134:3::11 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org. [2001:4830:134:3::11]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g4si666331qkm.163.2018.04.27.09.37.02 for (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 27 Apr 2018 09:37:02 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org designates 2001:4830:134:3::11 as permitted sender) client-ip=2001:4830:134:3::11; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org designates 2001:4830:134:3::11 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: from localhost ([::1]:49116 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fC6Mn-000695-Rd for alex.bennee@linaro.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2018 12:37:01 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44199) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fC6Mh-00068s-Ef for qemu-arm@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2018 12:36:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fC6Mc-00011n-IZ for qemu-arm@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2018 12:36:55 -0400 Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73]:55910 helo=mx1.redhat.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fC6Mc-00011S-Do; Fri, 27 Apr 2018 12:36:50 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BD5B41662E0; Fri, 27 Apr 2018 16:36:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.36.116.17] (ovpn-116-17.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.17]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42D0B200BCB7; Fri, 27 Apr 2018 16:36:40 +0000 (UTC) To: Markus Armbruster References: <1521452376-25099-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com> <87in8qf2w3.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> <62dba5cf-b497-1a98-0af5-971e169a3458@redhat.com> <877eou2nek.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> <099d2af4-8fe3-f80c-693f-495accb26a17@redhat.com> <40c06711-f9a0-3440-9a47-8230cbcb3d55@redhat.com> <87muxoehnp.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> From: Thomas Huth Message-ID: <155fc4fe-f8d6-a3d9-0f50-d5384a09835a@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 18:36:38 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87muxoehnp.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.11.54.4 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.7]); Fri, 27 Apr 2018 16:36:46 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: inspected by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.7]); Fri, 27 Apr 2018 16:36:46 +0000 (UTC) for IP:'10.11.54.4' DOMAIN:'int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com' HELO:'smtp.corp.redhat.com' FROM:'thuth@redhat.com' RCPT:'' X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 66.187.233.73 Subject: Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] qom-test X-BeenThere: qemu-arm@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Maydell , Eduardo Habkost , QEMU Developers , =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= , qemu-arm , qemu-ppc Errors-To: qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-arm" X-TUID: nakxs9AbK7bZ On 27.04.2018 18:30, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Thomas Huth writes: > >> On 27.04.2018 12:20, Peter Maydell wrote: >>> On 27 April 2018 at 07:06, Thomas Huth wrote: [...] >>>> Shall we change qom-test to also only test with the "none" machine in >>>> the normal "make check" mode and only do the full test with all machines >>>> in "make check SPEED=slow" ? >>> >>> We definitely want something that tries to instantiate every >>> machine, because that does catch bugs. >> >> Yes, after having a closer look at this one, I also think that we should >> *not* change it to run with "none" by default only. The 'qom-list' >> command results in quite a different output depending on which machine >> you run it on. > > Only running "none" is too naive. For the targets that have "versioned" machine types, I think we could skip all the older machine versions, so that we only test with pc-i440fx-2.12 but not with pc-i440fx-2.11 and older anymore. That would need some more or less clever algorithm to detect the latest version, though. Thomas