From: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
To: Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong@huawei.com>
Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, drjones@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] arm: virt-acpi: each MADT.GICC entry as enabled unconditionally
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 11:43:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160201114309.5517e83d@nial.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56AC16E6.8010300@huawei.com>
On Sat, 30 Jan 2016 09:50:30 +0800
Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong@huawei.com> wrote:
> On 2016/1/29 22:24, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > in current impl. condition
> >
> > build_madt() {
> > ...
> > if (test_bit(i, cpuinfo->found_cpus))
> >
> > is always true since loop handles only present CPUs
> > in range [0..smp_cpus).
> > But to fill usless cpuinfo->found_cpus we do unnecessary
> > scan over QOM tree to find the same CPUs.
> > So mark GICC as present always and drop not needed
> > code that fills cpuinfo->found_cpus.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > It's just simple cleanup but I'm trying to generalize
> > a bit CPU related ACPI tables and as part of it get rid
> > of found_cpus bitmap and if possible cpu_index usage
> > in ACPI parts of code.
> > ---
> > hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c | 26 +++-----------------------
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c b/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> > index 87fbe7c..3ed39fc 100644
> > --- a/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> > +++ b/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> > @@ -46,20 +46,6 @@
> > #define ARM_SPI_BASE 32
> > #define ACPI_POWER_BUTTON_DEVICE "PWRB"
> >
> > -typedef struct VirtAcpiCpuInfo {
> > - DECLARE_BITMAP(found_cpus, VIRT_ACPI_CPU_ID_LIMIT);
> The definition of VIRT_ACPI_CPU_ID_LIMIT should be removed as well.
Ok, I'll send v2 with fixup.
>
> Otherwise:
>
> Reviewed-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
>
> > -} VirtAcpiCpuInfo;
> > -
> > -static void virt_acpi_get_cpu_info(VirtAcpiCpuInfo *cpuinfo)
> > -{
> > - CPUState *cpu;
> > -
> > - memset(cpuinfo->found_cpus, 0, sizeof cpuinfo->found_cpus);
> > - CPU_FOREACH(cpu) {
> > - set_bit(cpu->cpu_index, cpuinfo->found_cpus);
> > - }
> > -}
> > -
> > static void acpi_dsdt_add_cpus(Aml *scope, int smp_cpus)
> > {
> > uint16_t i;
> > @@ -458,8 +444,7 @@ build_gtdt(GArray *table_data, GArray *linker)
> >
> > /* MADT */
> > static void
> > -build_madt(GArray *table_data, GArray *linker, VirtGuestInfo *guest_info,
> > - VirtAcpiCpuInfo *cpuinfo)
> > +build_madt(GArray *table_data, GArray *linker, VirtGuestInfo *guest_info)
> > {
> > int madt_start = table_data->len;
> > const MemMapEntry *memmap = guest_info->memmap;
> > @@ -489,9 +474,7 @@ build_madt(GArray *table_data, GArray *linker, VirtGuestInfo *guest_info,
> > gicc->cpu_interface_number = i;
> > gicc->arm_mpidr = armcpu->mp_affinity;
> > gicc->uid = i;
> > - if (test_bit(i, cpuinfo->found_cpus)) {
> > - gicc->flags = cpu_to_le32(ACPI_GICC_ENABLED);
> > - }
> > + gicc->flags = cpu_to_le32(ACPI_GICC_ENABLED);
> > }
> >
> > if (guest_info->gic_version == 3) {
> > @@ -599,11 +582,8 @@ void virt_acpi_build(VirtGuestInfo *guest_info, AcpiBuildTables *tables)
> > {
> > GArray *table_offsets;
> > unsigned dsdt, rsdt;
> > - VirtAcpiCpuInfo cpuinfo;
> > GArray *tables_blob = tables->table_data;
> >
> > - virt_acpi_get_cpu_info(&cpuinfo);
> > -
> > table_offsets = g_array_new(false, true /* clear */,
> > sizeof(uint32_t));
> >
> > @@ -630,7 +610,7 @@ void virt_acpi_build(VirtGuestInfo *guest_info, AcpiBuildTables *tables)
> > build_fadt(tables_blob, tables->linker, dsdt);
> >
> > acpi_add_table(table_offsets, tables_blob);
> > - build_madt(tables_blob, tables->linker, guest_info, &cpuinfo);
> > + build_madt(tables_blob, tables->linker, guest_info);
> >
> > acpi_add_table(table_offsets, tables_blob);
> > build_gtdt(tables_blob, tables->linker);
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-01 10:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-29 14:24 [Qemu-arm] [PATCH] arm: virt-acpi: each MADT.GICC entry as enabled unconditionally Igor Mammedov
2016-01-29 14:59 ` [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-devel] " Shannon Zhao
2016-01-29 15:26 ` Andrew Jones
2016-01-29 15:44 ` Shannon Zhao
2016-01-29 16:07 ` Andrew Jones
2016-02-03 14:50 ` Andrew Jones
2016-01-29 16:35 ` Igor Mammedov
2016-01-30 1:50 ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-01 10:43 ` Igor Mammedov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160201114309.5517e83d@nial.brq.redhat.com \
--to=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=zhaoshenglong@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).